?By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.?John 13:35 God is Love.
Yeah because building things and repairing infrastructure is not important at all...
again charging someone and getting a conviction are two very different things.
Poor, anti-Semitic fascist.
Again, Kevin. Kevin, you aren't getting this.
Given time, the Fentanyl will take them out.
The "bigotry" argument is a straw man argument. Inherently dishonest faithunreasoner.
There are different funerals? As to the women, breathing?
The rule should not need any interpretation. None of the Bible and what is in it needs it either, it is Gods word directly or inspired so it is written as it was needed to be read and understood.
Unless your argument is that pregnancy is an ailment in need of a cure - and please never speak to me again if that is the case - terminating pregnancy is not a health improvement.
"19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them."
No criterion. Just an unnamed intelligent creator. We've barely left Earth and haven't seen much of our own planet, let alone 10 ft below most of it.
Both "major" parties are a complete dumpster fire.
Go die from within, pinhead.
Again, Ted, this is not a disagreement over an opinion.
I agree with your statement. I think evolution is compatible with theism and even though in past years, I've had some reservations to Macro evolution; nevertheless, I am kinda agnostic on it as I don't think there is sufficient evidence for it. I really think the evidence points to God creating a small number of kinds and they flourished from there. I think kinds is like "family of species". There are only about 5,000 animal families. I don't think evolution is capable of adding large amounts of DNA to create new limbs/organs to make such a significant jump. I think God had to give the basic prints for each family and they flourished from there. There really isn't much difference within the families. The changes are about size and looks for the most part, but the same type limbs.
a new way, and how is that ? the NFP and the U3 thru U6 unemployment rate are complied by the BLS, today under Trump as they were, the same way under Obama.
Follow the interest payments on Gov debt.
Nothing will change until someone figures out how to bring the Vatican to the world court. The RCC is a corporation. The individual international branches get in sued they declare bankruptcy or pay a settlement but the main corporate headquarters is never indicted or charged. Business goes on as usual.
At this point, that's all we can do.
You have to upload an image, but I did that for one, I will go ahead and send out invites
Try once more, in English or Russian, genius
It isn't offered as proof of theistic views, only as logical cutoff of some conventional arguments against theistic views.
It definitely wouldn't hold up in court, but she knows good and well she was shady. A lot of people get away with stuff that's technically legal but not moral. Own your (general your) actions instead of blaming them on the actions of others.
Saw, ?The Week Of? on Netflix and loved it. I won?t say I hated the Sandler flick just to sit with the cool kids.
Well, I am a male and I like wearing ladies' underwear that buy for myself often interacting with store personnel. No problems at all.
In the ME we observe a large-scale religious war: Shia against Sunni. They kill each other by hundreds a day. Who of them are "islamic fundamentalists?
Racism of today is simply a counter movement against egalitarianism, which is a prominent philisophical phenomenon.
I don't know. I also guess she won't be coming to the shower. I mean at some point this won't work
Ok...you admit they exist. Why do people contend with each personally? We often know what to do, but hardly do it. There's a degree of how much each of us will do. When we are weak we give in. Its temptation. That points to a source for each doesn't it?
Well yes, A video embeded in a post by "the department of memes" could never be refuted?