Trump already challenged Rex Tillerson to an IQ test and he ran like a coward. lol
Unless it's the mutually exclusive part that is untrue.
You love to push this false narrative that bans or "conversion therapy" are bans on helping anyone coping with being LGBTQ+. Here's what California's ban actually says. AB 2943, Section 2:
EVERYONE is a descendant of Adam.
Again, statement like yours show a profound misunderstanding, and perhaps even a willful misrepresentation of how evolution actually works.
......except when it states that ''tomorrow, for example, it's gonna rain cats AND dogs'' ! ! ^o^
Agreed. We have the same character for our avatars.
Who gardens at night?
Right... and her speaking to him doesn't mean she'll be the ONLY person to speak to him ever again. Nor does it mean she can't rally people who have been working in that sphere to come together and facilitate a meeting with the President and those fighting for reform later.
The irony is that the initial travel ban was put in place for a three month period to allow the administration to review visa procedures in those countries. That was 18months ago, so they have had plenty of time to review those procedures.
Again, all your god's rules and laws remain until earth passes away. Is the earth still here? Why are you unable to answer?
Context, my friend.
You mean he's not going to light up the White House in the rainbow colors?? *Gasp!*
My bestie family went every Saturday when I spent the night I would go too
Thank you: I mentioned the importance of providing examples below, I agree. Is love only a human concept or does it also describe something observable outside mankind?
What I learned from my sociology classes years ago about morality is that it is the reason or justification for behavior. We do ... because of ... Whether it be because people want to please God, their mother or themselves. So any morality is personal and subjective. On the other hand, ethics are the rules that society has agreed upon. So, the death penalty might be legal depending on the society (and irrespective of individual morality), as might drug use or abortion or any other controversial subject, if the society deems it ethical.
This isn't a new thing. We see that Catholics as members do not care. The institution doesn't care. Nothing substantial has been done to address this.
I read this comment and the word that stands out most is 'MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'.
DJ T-Grumpy is a pathological LIAR pal. He LIES about anything, so he never had bone SPURS, you moron ........
Well, yes, right. with a ---but---
Lmao oh my
Yes, that is why any sound and healthy faith, whether religious or not, is based on evidence and sound reasoning, i.e., valid logic. Empirical evidence is a very important kind of evidence, but Freethinkers, skeptics and genuine agnostics do not claim that other kinds are not valid.
I can't even imagine choosing a surgeon for social reasons. Holy moley.
No rain or sun on my ballot though :)
Yes, just like Socrates, Plato and Buddha are also fictional based on your same criteria
Fet life dot org and remember we're all people, top and bottom, and get to know the people before you start the scene.