Do you mean extramarital?
Because I believe my church best expresses how to live a sanctified life, and I reject your claim that our doctrine is is either hateful or bigoted. We demand OUR members live a moral code, that includes the law of Chastity. We do not demand non-members live by it.
I'm sure it's entertaining to most folks but I don't get entertained by seeing people commit murder and mayhem
It (The Battle for God) was one of her books I most enjoyed, so I was a little surprised by this headline. At the same time, I haven't read this book, so I don't really feel qualified to speak to it.
I have an unbelief in Ra, will he make me eat those words?
talent show with pics... I got a Joan Rivers pic...
Gottabesaid, my posting history is wide open. In it, you'll find a multitude of references to how little I like Doug Ford. I can't fathom what possessed the PC membership to choose him, it just makes no sense. The writing was already on the wall about Wynne's fall from grace even while Brown was still at the helm. Why did they feel that a loud, blustery caricature of a man was required to topple the wicked witch Wynne? Could they not see how Christine Elliott (or, for that matter, Caroline Mulroney) would be more than capable of leading the party to strong victory? I don't suppose we will ever know why he was chosen over the more experienced and frankly better suited candidates. So the PCs are stuck with Ford ? for now ? and so is every voter who can't in good conscience vote for Wynne or for Horwath. They can stay home or they can hold their nose and vote for the PC candidate in their riding, hoping that, collectively, the PCs have enough competent and effective MPPs so as to balance out the detriment the party suffers through poor leadership.
I'm not nervous. I am certain to be struck by lightening before I need to be concerned
It would definitely have to be sweet for me to tolerate it. I will try your suggestion. Thanks!
Lol. You?re stuck on your phony racism charges.
Why would you want someone to maternity photos
Or what if verse 1 is a common literary tool called a synoptic statement??
Oh.... it came to be BEFORE the beginning?
I've been unfair to,you, calling you a weak minded fuck. You are actually a sniveling weak minded fuck. Now shut your cockhole.
Never said requirement, nice try to mince words and make a big word salad,
Back Home ......????
Only those who claim that the resurrection didn't occur have the burden of proof, not those who simply don't believe it. Claims and beliefs are not synonymous with proof. Again, put up or shut up!
Oh it has to be Camembert with broken crackers :p
Your comment is the only one that matters on this thread! The Fundamentalist of ANY Religious Organization have it all wrong and do not represent Christ in any way, shape or form. ALL Religious Organizations have created and applied their own Theology in order to create their positions of Headship over the Men in their Organizations. I will speak of the Christian sects first. By using theological applications, they were/are able to create positions of Authority/Headship/Shepherdship/Intercessor/Lordship over the Christian men in their Churches/Congregations. They place themselves in between Man and Christ but..... We read at 1 Corinthians 11:3 that Christ is the Head of a Man. There is no room for any one else to come in between Christ and the Man. This agrees with Ephesians 5:22.25. The Shepherds spoken of in Acts chapter 20 were appointed by the Apostle Paul who was very concerned that the Wolves Jesus warned about at Matthew 7:15 were going to enter into the Christian Congregations after Paul was gone. Paul had warned of these ones forming an Apostasy at 2 Thessalonians Chapter 2. It takes quite a bit of Theological Application to produce a Doctrine that allows Men to take Headship over Christian Men. This is a Theological position held by all modern Christian Organizations, it is not Scriptural. Religious Organizations have moved so far from the teachings of Christ that it makes absolutely no sense to belong to one. Note: I am a Christian Man. I Profess Jesus Christ. God's Word the Bible is my guide. I believe it was written for all of us to read daily and learn it's full message. No one should need the Middle Man[ Religious Organization] to achieve their personal relationship with God through Christ.
The smug condescension in your post is typical of religious nuts. You think you are in contact with a supernatural creature that can bend the laws of physics in exchange for a wish or for grasping a T shaped talisman and that is the only thing in your life that makes you feel like you have authority or power over other people. You don't.
Hitler is reported to have referenced the Armenian Massacres, asking who remembered them any more. Stalin did remove whole nationalities to "reservations," the Krim Tatars and the Jews. But removal and resettlement is not the same as wholesale killing. In remembering the four genocides, the first was Armenians, who were substantially different from the Turks and had begun to develop the concept of a separate nation. The Jews, who were much closer, often using the same language and same dress. The Cambodians were the third, and they killed each other purely on the basis of differences in education and cultural orientation, but same language and culture. And finally the Hutus and Tutsis, who hard an artificial grouping imposed on them mostly by the Belginas giving one group slightly more privileges but were the same people, speaking the same language, and all facing the same problems.
Here's your problem, summarized in a crude graph, which is offered as an over-simplified schematic.