Belief in something with directly contradictory evidence is different than religion.
Well, if you feel that way...
Three greatest miracles in the Christian religion are 1.) Resurrection, 2.) Virgin Birth, and 3.) Being born a white guy in the Middle East. The greatest works of art do not lie!
Or, perhaps one might read the Bible and live accordingly.
Why should we get together and talk about our favorite sins, religious or not? It seems a bit strange to me
i,m saying Paul did not meet Jesus. Why. He could have and he would have if he was real. Why did Paul not do the pilgrimage to Jerusalem like i did and Christians do today.
" I see heron addicts sick under blankets"
Hopefully this nonsense, combined with the Eagles bullshit, will put an end to any and all White House invites for 'professional' sports teams. Celebrating a bunch of grand standing millionaires bitching about 'oppression' is beyond tiring.
You don't get it.
I don't disagree. I especially agree that culture will have to change drastically.
I do not thinks so, I believe people are going to come out in droves this time to ensure this clown is not reelected.
Jerry Springer, please pick up a white courtesy phone....Jerry Springer...
It's very relevant, but I can see why you don't want to answer. A "yes" or "no" answer would be akin to making a claim...
Your demANTIFAcrat Alinsky tactics will not work here.You just never learn and spew garbage and hope something sticks.If you had one coherent point to answer would be your point but no thats not what Alinsky taught you demANTIFAcrats.You LIE and LIE and LIE liar.
I admit that I made no comment about emotions and value experiences being at all necessary for the empirical sciences.
It is ok... I posted on HS about the weekend.
Yes, we both agree that you made up a story!
Does this "anything" have a cause for its existence?
And there it is. You didn't provide evidence, you provided a chart and now, instead of defining it's relevance, you're claiming that I'm not smart enough to understand it's relevance. An argument that assumes relevance in the chart without demonstrating any relevance and assumes things about my intelligence without demonstrating your ability to judge my intelligence. It's a fallacious debating tactic but used a lot by those who can't actually make their points.
Same. Has it made you reconsider being here?
you failed to answer the question