don't give a shit, she went down on him, I haven't heard anything about him grabbing her by the head and doing a pelvic thrust. was it inappropriate given his marriage, and that they worked together, hella yes but not illegal. the only dumb thing he did was freaking lie and perjure himself. man I wouldn't give a damn If i were president and sleeping with a different chick every night, i'd be proud (as long as i wasn't married and she didn't work for me), i'd make sure that's the type of info that would get leaked to the press, I would leak everywhere. I don't know about the chicks, but most of the men in america wouldn't give a shit and would honestly be jealous. I'd be using my title as president to get pussy (as long as i carried out the duties of my office). i mean who doesn't want to sleep with the president whether they are male or female (ignore the current president, even his wife doesn't want to sleep with him), as long as they are good looking and a decent human being. that'd be a hell of a story to share with ur friends,
Our brains are wired to receive and contain the message of fear - so it works as a political rallying point.
No, man, I gave you a freaking link. Republican voters voted for a neo n azi who thinks the holocaust never happened. He is a pure up racist and member of the na zi part of america.
Not scientific Theories with a capital "T". Please learn the difference.
First you acknowledge the possibility of a first cause, then you apparently claim that the idea of a first cause is "debunked superstition".
You mean next week, right?
Trump speaks.....Liberals everywhere weep, wet themselves, and throw tantrums
that is what I don't get selling their religion is one thing by hooked or crooked is another, where is their "higher ground"? Why so desperate?
Did you watch the video, because I bet I can prove you are most definitely in the group 3 alarmist subset.
Almost. It was translated into the Septuagint as "parthenos" and the error kept perpetuating itself through time and translation. Note that the virgin birth is recounted only at Matthew 1:18-25 and Luke 1:26-38. Why this invidious omission from Mark, the earliest Gospel, and John, the latest?
A business owner doesn't have the right to exclude an entire class of people from taking advantage of his goods and services, or even of one specific good or service. No. We can thank the bigots of the Jim Crow days for making that the law of the land here in the U.S. "We don't serve your kind" is not a legally defensible position, even if it's modified to be "we don't serve your kind wedding cake".
Cricket looks even more like shit when you do understand it.
Not supposed to. That doesn't mean bad Muslims, not following Sharia, won't say it does for political reasons. And it also can be about the nature of the blasphemy. Is it against the common God, or is it only disrespectful to Muslims and Islam. Both might be construed to be treasonous, which then becomes a different issue. Remember the story of a man without a country? He says as a military officer he wishes never to hear the name of the United States again. He is sentenced to have his rash wish fulfilled. He is put aboard a naval ship, and never allowed to leave in port. And he sails the rest of his life on a US ship but never again gears the name, because if he was exiled, he might well hear the name of his native country. His case is fully analogous to blasphemy against the country rather than the deity.