Totally missed the word friend.
I'm aware that a couple of instances doesn't make for statistical significance. It was just a coincidence that I hadn't thought about "Gish Gallops" for some time, but felt it appropriate to label one as such yesterday.
What are you doing about global hunger, besides eating dinner?
what evidence, and what wisdom exactly are you addressing? do you mean his actual wisdom or the collection of stories sometimes referred to as the "wisdom of Solomon"? I think the question I would counter you with, is: what specifically do you think is so wise? wise beyond our current capacity?
As Jesus pointed out claiming to be a god is not blasphemy. Claiming to be in agreement with God is not blasphemy.
It doesn't disappoint me. I just do not understand what you are trying to prove.
My act is not phoney. I see the difference even if you don't.
What happens if you don't take any pill?
I don't. That's why I think it is ridiculous to believe in it. If supernatural processes/deities are to be believed, they should be evident. Otherwise there is zero reason to believe. It would just be humans trying to convince other humans about something they can't prove.
Are you suggesting Sarah Sanders is a child abuser?
You do realize that weather and climate are different things, right? Climate controls weather patterns. They changed the name from global warming to climate change to help people realize the distinction of climate and weather. The US military supports the idea that climate change will have an impact on their bases world wide, but I guess they are just trying to get some of that sweet sweet climate change money as well.
Sciencophobia? Lmao Wow.
Your comment is spot on....I think it would be a huge mistake for JT to expand the trade war so I am hoping his team has something to offer Trump to reduce the tariffs. They won't be evaporated but there is room for negotiation. Having said that, threats by Trudeau to expand the tariff war will be very bad news for Canadians. I hope he is mature enough to understand that.
It means the ?evidence? from these studies is unreliable. It means improper test setup. It means nothing can be concluded based on their methodology. This isn?t hard to understand, it?s Science 101. Try reading more, it may help you.
All arguments aside, I am glad you made a good decision with your child and were able to help him. That being said, how hard was it to institutionalize him? I've heard horror stories of difficulties faced by some families.
What was unfair about what the Kahns said?
That makes no sense.
Did the person who wanted the Hitler cake reply with "No no no, not THAT Hitler! This cake's for
I suggest blocking him, he is a moron.
Right. I spend zero time thinking about the size of another person's family but people can legit not help caring what others do
Bank account is fine. Glad you are keeping busy and sniffing the fumes.
Haha okay man
This has been a good week. In the past the SCOTUS has been political and ruled for one side and then another regardless of the constitutional concerns. I'm worried another shoe might drop soon.
I know. But there's science in the book nonetheless. Its truth.