You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out. When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay all out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all the men have out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game!
He will be if the Democratic Party doesn't get their act together. Of course getting their act together will mean doing the opposite of what Willard wants.
You know I am!
Then you are just trolling, if you are not attempting to have a conversation or persuade.
Why are these conversations always escorted by this type of response?
Then you should have no problem proving the existence of Solomon's wisdom.
I agree, but I won't criticise him for doing so. D'you know why? Because I support the First Amendment with more than lip service.
I am despondent today.
He is correct in his analogy. Which is why they saw other religions are a threat to their power.
So, you are shifting your explanation from (1) god didn't want to give Judah everything he wanted, to (2) the people weren't righteous.
OUr morals are our morals. They develop over time
WAY too many to list... But let's start with the fact that the birthdate for Jesus cannot be both around the time of the Census of Quirinius (however that is spelled) and during the reign of Herod who died 10 years earlier. Let's also look at how the EASTER part of the synoptic gospels cannot tell the same story... particularly problematic when that is THE most important event in the Christian mythology.
No, YOU first.