1) Doesn't really matter if such would be necessary to explain the universe.
"No" should come in handy here for you folk.
lmao no i am legit excited for the anesthesia. it?s the best sleep you?ll ever get.
Jesus is the first and last created directly-all other things created through him-Prov 8-Coll 1:15-16
I concur. They are born into a society which breeds an inhumane worldview which gives us groups like Daesh. Or as CNN calls them, moderate rebels.
Substitute? Its trying to make sense of what gradualism and natural selection can't explain.
That's the point, its not rational if the assumptions don't pan out in reality. Genetics can track what's happening, and gradualism is not happening. Natural selection isn't happening like they want either. It produces small change, adaptation but that's it.
His business, his money, his right to do with it as he pleases.
You're too stupid to dialogue with.
Note that I have told you several times now that there was no first man or first woman. Not sure why you lack the cognitive capacity to comprehend this.
Say it all you want, but time and time again someone goes on the news and debunks this talking point. Btw, Trump's border approach is comparative to Operation Streamline, which was a Bush program.
They would only have been bad if they had been raised to be bad. At the time, they weren't bad. They weren't evil. They were innocent. And God killed them. God killed innocent infants, and you applaud that.
nature has to adapt. Example, if the majority of females die, the males will have to take care of the young. Its survival it has nothing to do with existence...
they just want American protection.
The universe is as approximately old as the science says. Genesis is irrelevant 1) because it was written by, and for, a pre-scientific people, who 2) were not teaching science, but rather a Middle Eastern creation myth as seen under the auspices of their claimed covenant with their deity.
You are speculating on what you think will happen. The failure rate of Trump predictions is very close to 100 percent.
Hollywood would actually suggest that is very much the case.
So nothing? No evidence? Thought so.
You have bought into the denier mythology of "they were predicting an ice age in the 1970s. A few scientists well outside the mainstream of climate science understanding at that time did think that we might be headed for prolonged cooling, but they were in the minority. Broecker represents what climate science was predicting at the time. And of course, regardless of how much of a consensus ther emight have been on the issue at the time, the CO2 warming advocates turned out to be correct.
He keeps promising he's going to leave but he doesn't leave. Keep your word, man!! leave!
Theists Anonymous? Theists desperately trying to give up theism and become atheists ;-)
i think Constantine's zealoty is probably closer to pragmatism, but yes, the devolution into feudalism absolutely undermined the empire. especially in the east where we can see it in a death spiral, where increasing weakness leads to more feudal policies which leads to more weakness.
That's why the Catholic church worked so hard to keep Latin in the church for so long.
"Why does life being so extremely unlikely mean that it is unlikely created for us?"