Why didn't you say so! Hi. :)
In, for lack of a more delicate term, regime change. Again, I don't mean
No, you failed to make one. You agreed with me, that is all.
God will play whatever role he is given in the imagination of people that way inclined.
So context and meaning matters then? Thought so.
Being prejudiced against stupid people isn't racism.
Ooooo dont look at me like that????
They believe in more hybridization and fewer true species.
Haha, no I haven't.
Widespread blow back too. Eg.McConnell and Pelosi.
Well, one of the key rationale's for granting tax exempt status to churches, besides the fact that the donations their members give have in most cases already been taxed, is so they can give tax exempt status to other not religious groups that perform charitable work, to encourage that kind of grass roots outreach which is considered to be a good thing. If only non religious charitable work was tax exempt, that would be a kind of discrimination against religious groups, and a violation of the 1st Amendment. So all groups defined as charitable are treated the same. It makes it possible for folks to deduct their donations to the Red Cross and the like, as a kind of carrot by the government to make those kind of donations. But it must include religious charitable work to be fair under our system.
One change would be that the returning crusaders would not be there with information and experience with the easier, gentler and more civilized life of the more cultured and civilized Near East.
Been completely explained, but you quit responding to me. Funny, how
Just because it is something you don't like, doesn't make it hyperbole.
Ahhhh a dose of bad parenting , when parents dont teach there kids how to lose or know that the world doesn't revolve around them, nice nice
I never said I was "fine with any method of abortion that takes place before implantation". I view the "morning after" and "second option" pills, as well as the IUD as murder or at least attempted murder. However, under the law, it cannot be proved "beyond reasonable doubt" that in each case the drug or the device was what had prevented the implantation. The most that can be legally established is "intent". Proving "intent" is next to impossible, because it would require collecting and searching the menstrual flow looking for a blastocyst. If my action is intended to to kill a person, but then it is discovered that the person never existed, I am guilty of nothing. Therefore for reasons of practicality, the law grants the rights at the moment of implantation in the womb.
No, he really doesn't. He is a political hack who supports any cause that he thinks will get him elected.