Not everyone is able to get the hell out, and there are more towns that would be happy to be like that than you know. Getting out to somewhere not like that isn't always that easy.
So, teaching children that the races are equal (not just about the civil rights movement) would be indoctrination in your opinion?
She's ten thousand times more qualified than trump. You're talking to a mccain voter bub.
Don?t forget, per Einstein: ?Imagination is more important than knowledge.?
Did your chaser catch you?
Obama did not wiretap Trump. Period.
I don't have a problem with *anyone* using the political process to effect positive change -- in this case, rational gun control measures. And people with different beliefs and even political parties can come together on certain issues, like gun control, to make the current situation better. To change laws that aren't working. To change background checks that are ineffective. To mandate things to ensure that owners are properly trained in safe operation and storage.
Yes. ARPANET was intended to be a contingency communication for the DoD, DoJ, DoS in the event of a nuclear attack.
At what cost though, that's the $64,000 question.
my rollercoaster must be on a down hill today ;)
You want to discuss Christianity on the OP devoted to Muslim immigration. I guess you need to find someone with similar interests. Not me.
Thank goodness my former employer never found out how stupid I was. They were so fooled, they kept offering me big increases to continue consulting to our major Science accounts. Sadly, I just wasn't interested in working anymore. Age does that.
LOL... My comment was focused on the narrow argument that their origins are from latin America. I also didn't mention anything about their tattoos, or that babies cry in the middle of the night when they teethe. They weren't relevant to my comment.
Mmmmm nice purrrrrrrrfect. Now the string quartet needs silk or cotton blindfold?
What?s wrong with stoicism, with facing adversity with calm resolution?
I honestly don't know WTF the membership was thinking when they chose Ford over Elliott. SMH.
Nope. I don't believe it to be that. I see it as a man made religion with flaws, a belief system built on faith, and many moderate followers with a few bad eggs trying to spoil the bunch.
You were asked a direct question. You failed. You failed because you believe yourself above reproach. Good bye.
I don't give a rat's ass who wins so long as I'm entertained. I have an unbroken record of more than 35 years feeling that way (I started watching in the early 1980s).
Yep. Because there is a fundamental belief that women's bodies actually belong to men to do what they want with and when a woman says 'no', certain men can't handle it.
I'm trying to talk to you because I like you and I don't want you to be gone.
Ummmm I?ll never tell
Exactly. Chances are that unless you are expecting it, you won't even see it coming. That's why most of the damn time...it's accidents in your homes, cuz none of y'all actually need to use it.
By taking away constitutional rights?
No, but apparently on every other piece of furniture in the room . . .
I can't say I'm
No it is subjective. It is someone's opinion of what is right or wrong. Whether one person or group decision, it is still subjective. Any objective criteria you can think of for morality is itself subjectively chosen. Look deeply enough and you will always end at a subjective basis. That is because it is concept of the human mind, not a physical property that can be objectively determined.
It would actually be even/even.