Ah yes...the "did you take your meds" gambit...nothing better, green!
yep...reminds me of a short flight i was on, and the person sitting next to me brought a small box of hot wings with her to eat. (I absolutely hate the smell of buffalo sauce) Even when she finished the wings, the empty box was still there on her tray stinking to high heaven. but kept my mouth shut and was just thankful it was a short flight.
There are rapists in Trump's base.
What wine do you drink again? Wanna make sure I've got us covered lol
Guess I'll have to get creative and find other ways to keep you up all night.
I do not have to listen to you.
As far as I am concerned there is nothing "outside" of nature. We simply are not able to comprehend ALL of nature so some fool invented the word "supernatural".
I guess it all depends on the meaning of "post."
Ugh....same. I just can't motivate myself today.
That?s normal, I?d be a little worried if he wasn?t. Lol
Reality. No widdle linky to that.
Anymore name-calling, and we have to let you go. Ty.
They remain blind to their own hypocrisies.
You said that you wouldn't hand them over, conceivably even if they were illegal. That's on you.
So if those kids parents were sexually abusing them nobody has a say in what happens to them?
"That is why I post in small bites. I don?t want to overload your thinking skills and get ahead of you."
Not if they want to follow God.
"It's not a swindle."
By far the most commonly asserted argument of the absurd by atheists is the "lacker" argument, followed closely by the claim one cannot prove a negative, and near this is the assertion that they have no burden of proof in entering the conversation about a given god's existence. In fact, these three claims form an often unstated meta-argument which amounts to the idea that they are right by definition, which is as fallacious as any argument offered by theists.
Reporter presses assault charges against Maxine Waters:
Had the baker refused to sell anything to the couple or asked them to leave, you'd have a good comparison. But, that is not the case. So, nice try.
The accepted understanding is that the universe
What is so special about 1990? Any kind of historic singularity?
No such thing as a Mexican-American unless they have dual citizenship.
No, they do not and I am done talking to someone who is gonna lie about slavery,
That's what I said. They are perfectly themselves -- no pretenses, no deceptions, no lies, no "evil". A Canadian goose or a hummingbird or a monarch butterfly that can return thousands of miles to the same summering or wintering spot without any prior knowledge is wise beyond our comprehension.
Start with Kinder Morgan and keep going
That you know of.
You should read the Wikipedia article better, public broadcasting is absolutely not heavily controlled in the Netherlands. Don't try to be smart, you don't know anything about the Dutch broadcasting system.
Why pretend ? Just convert plus a child migrent can be as old as 25.
Sure there is. I posted several from various epistles for TFCC.
Barnyard ethics . . . I'm not sure why we're surprised that kids wind up acting like animals when . . .. oh, never mind . . .
God can not be proven or disproven. It is not the job of the athiest to prove god exsists. Most theists say that believing in god is a faith thing. People of religion have many different versions of the god and yet no theist demands proof that each version of god be proven.
He offered to sell them something they did not want/need or ask for. He does not get to decide which items people can purchase and which items are OK for them to buy. That is the definition of discrimination.
I don't think its necessarily bad. To have two people in charge requires time. I've been in meetings where everyone had a voice and they took all day. I've been in them where the lead says "here's the plan, any objections?" and it goes faster. I think some things are better when its everyone having equal say--a creative project, for example. I think some things are better when someone is in charge.