That chart is pretty much spot on!
I am ambivalent about
And a beautiful flag it is!
Is that why he was willing to sell them other items?
Since most people couldn't care less about what the Bible teaches to start with, what difference would it make? if someone is going to do what they chose to do anyway, they're really not looking for anyone's "input" are they?
And the dangerous mind pollution of religion
But you guys love pron. Isn't that what made Trump such a man?
Why shouldn't I speak the truth about my faith's crimes?
I've been addressing this logical flaw in another thread, if you're interested:
So with that in mind take another look at the Doctor. Do the research look for the messiah and ignore the followers, since we are fallible tend to be poor examples of Jesus. If you are interested I could recommend some books that could give you some logical explanations, along with personal testimony.
Here's the pic my boss sent.....
It?s all over the news. You need to pay attention.
Why are you so hung up on this singular point? The point is that there are many Christians who are criminals not sinners. Now pack your bags and go home.
I was going to the bank to take out a loan...tired of waiting..so I TOOK MY OWN loan out...I robbed the bank....I will pay them back with time....time spent in prison when caught
apparently there are no crimes thatcan be committed by a person who was raised in the conditions that mike was raised in.[terrible as they were.
I watched. It was.
No, Not really/ If you require fear to make you act decent, then you are not a very good person to begin with!
>>"?What makes this ?celebration? different or problematic??
That was addressed in the link. Most schools of Sunni Jurisprudence don't take that view.
SB. To your last paragraph, I think that human reason and human imagination are not actually separated from each other but very different in the application and effectiveness. I offer that most folks can as they mature control their imaginations and feelings enough to ?prioritize? for the intellectual reasoning more and wishful believing less.
Technically there was no "first copy". It was more or less a compilation of stories, passed down orally and some written, compiled into a single book. So I guess the first compiled copy could have been destroyed, but the stories would have still existed.