Time to expand the list!
So you think that your relgion give you the right to discrimnate and put down othrr groups?
Obviously, you do not know that which I know, so yes, in this subject, you are uneducated.
They call it leftist to justify their retardation.
Again as I answered to something else see that answer. Funny I didn't bother answering this question directly and your got impatient so you had to ask again.
Trump loves the swamp people!
She only calls out the fundamentalist Canadians
Democrats are hoping for bad economic news to help them in the mid-terms.
it's not even close to equal. the EU disproportionately benefits from their relationship with America. they have a lot more to gain than America does.
And yet he beat your hero. That has to suck!
Ooooh... I can see by the rest of your posts that you are the highest learned erudite on the topic of what IS and what's NOT atheism....
Slippery slope fallacy. Try again.
Frozen Reese's. Used to drink Coke and have one when I was younger. Mmmm, and then, the sugar rush!
Might want to look in to the physical aspect of these studies as parents or children saying the darndest things don't exactly cover it all (i.e. why are some born with physical malformations that coincide with events of past lives they're claiming to remember?... and how does sure verbiage cover it?)
Yup, they just regurgitate catch phrases and reword the same three fallacies in ever more complicated ways.
Yes they are observable., not by everyone and not using measures that can't quantify correctly. (kind of like putting a paintbrush in the hand of a deaf and blind person then telling them which colors to pick out). I didn't make the rules
This line of concern could be directed at many religions, not just Christianity.
Of the two, I think it's much more likely Clement is quoting Luke. The author also quotes in the same manner from 1 Corinthians ("of which He has rendered the Lord Jesus Christ the first-fruits by raising Him from the dead" - similar to 1 Corin 15), and we know it can't be Paul quoting Clement because Clement states outright that Paul is dead by that point.
They need LOTS of time to "investigate". After all, it took them over 200 YEARS to embellish James Callender's yellow journalism about President Jefferson's (imagined) dalliance with his slaves.
The day may come when the powers that be ?officially? eliminate it (like the powers that were once decided to eliminate many books of the OT, from my understanding). It would certainly help ?the case? being made by the Christian, I think.
Thank you, thank you.
Actually this is a very late addition to the bible, having occurred after the mid fourth century production of the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus, neither of which contains this pericope which appears to have been written to show that the so-called "Jesus" (not actually a name) supported forgiveness, which, as a "zealot for the law" (See Matt 5 and 15), he most certainly did not.
NO, we do not. We should outlaw abortion.
I have no money to pay anyone to do anything.
here is an interesting woman to read up on
It is down to 61% nowadays!
Sure, why not...
(Mat 21:1) And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem, and were come to Bethphage, unto the mount of Olives, then sent Jesus two disciples,
You mean the god you cannot prove to exist, but pretend to know all about.