Well now , yur beginning to git it!!! :) LOL!!! 1 cor. 1:26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:27But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; 28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:
Seats extend backwards.
I guess that means you still can't tell the difference. Let me give you a simple illustration:
I just did that last week lol
Really Isalm did not make its way all the way to the border of modern-day France? Islam never conquered by the sword? Islam was never held at bay by Constantinople till about the year 1400 right?
Just like nobody believes people see gods.
When you say 'God is...' you're making a claim in a 'natural world' language, English, and you need to substantiate that claim by showing that it's true in English, not in wishful thinking.
KCN sounds like a better choice.
Lol. I mostly have taken note of it's complete inanity.
I can respect that, but even that is abstract. When I was in Iraq and Afghanistan I know I personally did not think I am defending the whole nation. What happens if its in your face? What happens if you punched or a sick person intentionally sneezes on you, can your ethic allow you to then in turn go out your way to help them or even sacrifice for them?
Many of the signs have been here for centuries.
I wonder will they do the same for slavery?
When offered two explanations, viz., 'godditit' versus a demonstrable method, I go with the demonstrable method every time.
I?m against it, but I am pro choice (it?s a woman?s body, it?s her choice).
she has given me more hard times than help during hard times XD
You confuse Ford with the leftie Liberals and extremist NDP.
"Democratic Socialist is the same as saying the Peoples Democratic Republic of Korea."
Here is what is true, you can?t prove God does not exist and I can?t prove that he does, proof is a very high standard and concept best restricted to math, but we do have "evidence" and the "principle of the best explanation". God gave us a brain supplied us with logic and he expects us to observe and test our surroundings. Here?s what we know from observation and testing that the universe had an absolute beginning that means time, space, matter and energy at one point did not exist and now they do. That?s the basis of big bang cosmology. Dr. Krauss wrote a book titled ?The universe out of nothing? based on the findings of the Hubble telescope. Now it?s true he changed the definition of nothing but he?s a materialist and could not help himself. But without time when would you put anything and without space where would you put it. He and Richard Dawkins produced a video by the same title. How does nothing create? It can?t and so in desperation as a committed materialists / atheist he took it upon himself to change the definition of nothing, disingenuous.
Nope. As usual it is difficult to figure out what you are actually trying to say, but nope. It simply means that there are many competing religions that are all 100% convinced that only their religion is correct. This is an obvious fallacy.
"...every other dude just like him is watching and thinking 'I'm nothing like that animal.'"
A manual of bigotry and misogyny?