Not me. The writers of Mr Robot. (Sam Esmail) and Remi Malek's perfect reading of the monologue.
she lost her other hand in an unfortunate bacon accident
Your assumptions are just that and I'll not be dragged into such by an irrelevant question. Bottom line: Do people have choice what they do, homosexual, heterosexual, beastiality, pedopelia, a-sexual, pan sexual, bi?
This is correct. However, it's not to say mental illness isn't a factor in those perpetrating them as well.
Despite being an atheist, I recognized that they wanted to help in their own way so I have thanked them for their efforts. I did tell them that she had died - thankfully none of them told me that it was all part of god's plan.
Julian was a darned fascinating figure - PBS or some cable show could possibly do a very good documentary or drama (like I, Claudius) about Julian. The Man in the High Castle sounds interesting.
An answer avoiding rational discussion like yours has demonstrated its base in a bias, ideological and otherwise. It?s also a form of rote contradiction.
Who is in charge of creating a dumpster fire thread today?
1% of 100 and 1% of 100,000 are still just 1%. Volume discounts do not apply.
Or practice. Lots and lots of practice.
Catholics *are* Christians and the Catholics hardly have exclusive rights to killing people and oppressing them. Just read some of Martin Luther's teachings if you think otherwise.
As for "no two aesthetes agree upon what is beautiful." That isn't true at all. Besides it's not about what is beautiful and what isn't. It's about the existence of beauty as a thing for which there is no empirical evidence beyond the experiencing of it. Also, everything has a beauty to it. That is the beauty of which I speak.
I kind of agree with you yet again, but 100% accurate communication is an impossibility. Beyond 5he desire for other people to use their language as we would have them use it is our responsibility to make sure we have communicated correctly, that the recipient of our message understands us, and that we have understood their intended message.
"But this judgments were done in such a way that everyone is totally satisfied by it."
Sam .... :) and same to you.
That can be difficult to evaluate though. The Canadian legal standard is "anyone who claims refugee status has a right to a hearing on the matter." (Randy Quaid, Hollywood actor, most notoriously claimed he was refugee.)
The luck of the Irish has run out for the unborn...
Discerning what the author meant is actually much easier and straightforward than that.