While I agree with you in general, the situation is fraught with danger for the teacher. He/she may take the approach that science trumps religion and state that turning water into wine, walking on water, virgin birth and resurrection from death are not possible. The child may then go home and report to his/her parents that the teacher said that Christianity is all lies. This could do all kinds of damage to the teacher's career. It is a sad thing that talking the truth is so dangerous.
Should've seen my face.. I was just like, Ok bye now.
Good morning, all. My name is Jodie. I have one tattoo, therefore I am "easy".
People that say potahto, and tomahto are idiots.
More than just a few THEORIES have changed, but the FACTS remain. Whatever the Theory of Gravity, the FACT of gravity remains, , in exactly the same way that the FACTS of germ theory of disease remain. The "theory" of evolution, of how change happens, can and will change, but the FACT that organisms change over time, will not. Darwin didn't know a lot of science that is now common knowledge, and the THEORY of Evolution has changed very much since 1859, but not a single FACT has come to light that contradicts it in any way.
If I were religious, I'd pray for you.
This is why these monsters continue to thrive. It is sad. :(
Not irrelevant, since it's action that's needed, not thoughts and prayers: the latter helps no-one.
I used to never block anyone but lately I started giving it more use and I muss say- it is a relief. The constant bombardment of troll posts takes the joy out of Disqus because you can?t even have an intelligent conversation with them.
Sounds like she wants to leave you either way so keep the job.
Really? I didnt get that but maybe you are right
LOL - how could I feel left out when I have such a sterling example of deflectionism, whataboutism, and outright dissembling as you? For instance, you purposely chose to misrepresent my comment by omitting its stated purpose, which was to show that your idea of a Christian defense of Christendom would inevitably lead to the very same problems you claim it would solve. Or not solve, as the case may be. Honestly I would've credited you with simply not understanding the distinction if you hadn't been so consistent and single-minded in your attempts to misrepresent me...to myself. Maybe there's some credit to be had there after all.
Are you a BOT or something ? Or did you think I meant they literally asked for it verbally ?