You're kidding, right? Apparently your previous address was somewhere on the moon.
eye see! :0
I write the way the Russians ask me to write. They say dumb it down, I dumb it down.
So it's suspicious and off putting. Just as a Burka is. A trench coat has a time and a place and does not disguise the wearer. But even then as an item of clothing it can cause problems. I don't care if a woman wears a complete head to toe covering. I only care that she not be able to disguise herself. Just as I cannot wear a bala klava out in public unless it's 100 below zero.
Ugh IMMEDIATELY resorting to the echo chamber insult too like a candy-ass lil twatnozzle.
Awww, I do hope you're right, but then anything beats her brother's tantrums, and parents' unemployment, violence and drug use.
I'd not say EVERY man is easy, but you can definitely make the broad assumption that if he's male, and you define 'easy' as 'down for sexy time', he's likely 'easy'.
NO, I did NOT misread. I deliberately said slow, because you obviously are slow to "get it."
The facts support it. You dont see any correlation at all between progressive college admission boards and lopsided female admissions?
More importantly science freely admits it hasn't all the answers, invites criticism and wants to evolve it's beliefs. Religion claims it has had all the answers for thousands of years already, unalterable, period.
Got that right but they sure don't make it easy to tell the difference these days. Watching the news makes me dizzy some nights! Not to mention trying to figure out what is true and what isn't!
"god" does not immediately follow, but "supernatural" does. Morals are super-natural. You have force=mass x acceleration, that's natural. But a force can be used either for good or bad and it's the exact same f=ma, meaning that good and bad are something other than nature.
'And your religion of atheism/humanism/evolutionism ...'
Augustine of Hippo is the root cause of much that is wrong with Christianity, see his thoughts on Original Sin for example. (From Wikipedia)
And barely a rattle of your cage in your prattle. If it?s congratulations you want to give, try this on. I realized that an earlier comment you made about "convincing a majority of Social Science scholars of my views" has an even clearer response. What the hell do you think my perspective is predicated upon? I have a BSc in Bio Anthro and a Masters in IR, worked in Social Services for some time where I got trained by Education PhD?s in counseling.
No it isn't.
So if the religious person didn't know it was for a (insert even that goes against their religion here) than there is a loop hole and it won't go against their religion?