LOL no Sweden
More insults. You?ve posted nothing but a bunch of whiny shit. I know why you stick with such narrow parameters. Sorry. That is but one example. Trump has more than demonstrated his fascistic tendencies.
3 kids? I am so very sorry. ((hugs))
'Appeal to experience' is not a single unitary concept but a complex one which could include everything from standard experimental empiricism (which is by definition based on empirical experience/observation) to drug-induced hallucinations and much in between. Most knowledge claims are grounded in testimony or appeal to authority in any case (both in religion and other spheres such as current events, history and many others where we cannot directly experience the objects of cognition (e.g. the past or an event we cannot observe). The problem is not one of trusting experience or trusting alleged authorities, but rather determining *which* experiences and which alleged experts should be treated as reliable sources. Empiricism,among other things, tries to render observational experience a) systematic b) predictable and c) capable of being replicated by others. If we treat knowledge as hypotheses about what events will be observed/experienced under specified conditions (e.g. in a laboratory experiment) and our predictions pan out across multiple trials (i.e. we experience/observe the same results) than we have shown those experiences/observations to be capable of confirmation in public. They are still experiences, but they are not unique to individual subjects since they can be repeated (e.g. I experience burning when putting my hand into a flame, but so do others-- and in a way that can be easily demonstrated in public). So we *want* knowledge to be based on experience, but experience that has observable and predictable consequences which can be evaluated by multiple experiencers or observers.
The only result will be that rich people will have their abortion in England and poor people will be forced to do illegal and dangerous ones in Ireland.
Considering the snark that is patently apparent all over the place...I find the label of rudeness not merely misapplied but laughable. I know my intention...am responsible for what I write, not what you understand. Think/believe what you will.
As near as I can tell, Jesus had a bad weekend.
Seven is the number of completion and six is the number of man.
I don't even care about proselytising (in a non-intrusive manner). Just be a good person and we have no problems.
And secularism cannot also make up fairy tales as well?
You can track chemical change
The TV show "Life in Pieces" just did a segment on this where the boys were sent by wife/mom to a lingerie store to buy something for their daughter/sister.
Thank you! LOL
For the record...I truly do value & respect you speaking up & defending your friend. THAT TOO speaks volumes about you to me.
But it is interpretation. Of what the bible says.
Quote Alexis de Tocqueville - Democracy in America
Yeah and cold is just a lack of heat
Please explain how archaeology has backed up Christian myth as real.
Nothing you copied and pasted from your evolution denying Notebook reduces the fact that you confessed that there would be greater genetic diversity the further you go back and that indeed the fossil record shows a grand diversity in which today?s life arose from.
So be it, they commited a felony
I will be driving through Kansas this summer. I'll have to check it out. I'll take pictures!