Fear and faith? What about love and curiosity?
AA is a support group designed to help people stop drinking.
I would imagine so. I'd ask for one if I finished second.
As always, the devil will be in the details. Splitting parents and children may be considered a human right violation, or it may not. I don't think it's a stand alone threshold that has been crossed the moment it happens.
God was with Judah in both battles, according to the verse. God helped Judah win the first battle, but not the second battle. The only difference is the iron chariots.
As the majority party, the PCs have the option of granting the Liberals official party status even if the Libs don't win the required number of seats.
That's what I would like to find out. For example, a reference that Jews planned to make a raid on Medina and kill Muslim women and children. I didn't come across this neither in Ibn Ishaq nor in major collections of Hadith. Painting Muhammad's enemies in blackest colour kind of justifies mass execution of Jewish prisoners who surrendered to Muhammad's mercy.
Details, please. Show your work.
1. As a society is female genital mutilation allowed in the US? No, so why allow this?
OR ankle Tom , KKK
I agree but in my opinion and it's just my opinion, alot of things could be headed off at home before it ever goes that far
I doubt people use the same excuses for FGM.
I guess we have different perspectives. I see the modern situation as me making the claim that Jesus rose from the dead, I see the bible as the strongest piece of historical literature recording Jesus's life. I am making the claim, the bible is support for that claim.
We've done better than evolve resistance to smallpox (which is something that animals had already done before we walked the planet, it's called "an immune system") - we've eliminated it... perhaps you can tell me why your fairy in the sky didn't eliminate it... was it too difficult for its puny mind?
h0lygh0st is a witch.
You seem to think that God would think like us with our pathetic, finite physical brains. As God is the Infinite and pure Spirit, that assumption would be illogical.
You don't think everyone tries to reinforce their belief system rather than contradict it, regardless of how they get their news?
I don't know about the Quran.
I just explained in detail why. Did you not read the entire comment? What beliefs business owner have is irrelevant when it comes to working under their business license. They are free to practice their religion when at home or off the clock, but they can not run their business, open to the entire general public, subject to their personal religious beliefs.
Depends on how you are using the term "infallible"...
Please check out my response below. It?s not about mechanistic scientific complexity. The issue isn?t Science. It?s Existential Philosophy, at least, not Science. It?s a different Epistemology. He?s demonstrating the Scientism fallacy, like Dawkins and the rest.
Sure, after you first answer mine...
don't need no women drivers in racing! That's a
Atheism, in and of itself is flawed. A logical worldview must deal with the question of why there is something rather than nothing. Religion deals with that question. You may not like their answer, or agree with it, but tell me, how does any atheistic worldview coherently deal with this question?
Were they making light? It's one of those images designed to evoke a gut reaction.
I find that oddly arousing.
Mueller has not accomplished fk all. He still has no convictions.
Well, you've learned to avoid the adverb 'merely', anyway.
There are opinions from the sore losers and then there is reality! Trump is supposed to have blown up the world by now according to the Chicken Little Trump haters!
Sorry. I have been in a long and drawn out contest with a caveman atheist that believes science has shown that no God is needed. I have tried to show that the unknown is what drives science and moved us from the cave. If we say that the unknown does not exist then we move ourselves back into that cave. Logic leads us out of that cave and searches continually for the unknown. If we start to say something can't be or our world works without then we have shut that door to logic and we have moved back to that cave. I mean the whole definition of atheist is unscientific and not logical because it closes that door to the unknown. Just imagine if science has closed that door to the unknown, and said the unknown was not needed? Just imagine if science had stopped because there was no evidence? It is one thing to say you don't know if there is a God or not. That means you have not closed that door and still attempt to use logic. But if you claim that there is no God then you have closed that door and moved back to the cave.
Are you defined by just your physical being? If so, you are only part of a human being, your penis to be exact.
On personal hiatus.