"It has been proven that there was no spy placed in Rumps campaign and they did their job as they should have."
It supports everything, or more correctly can not object to anything.
I wasn?t aware of that rule.
There is only the most tangential of similarity between DNA and crystals. As with all of this stuff, you have to engage your common sense. Microscopic strands of DNA encode everything you are. Brain, heart, lungs, digestion, locomotion, reproduction, healing, and on, and on, and on, and on. Do you really not have some kind of instinctive sense of how ingenious DNA must be, to encode so much information in so few symbols? From day one, evolution is supported by a profound disregard for the complexity of life. A delusional view of life, really.
Do you have facts to back that up or is that more SJW rhetoric?
Objective--or have you forgotten.
I did not find the rest of your comment convincing. Taking a hyper-skeptical approach only shows fallible people can think themselves in circles, not that the Golden Rule is ambiguous.
OMG, I'm getting sick to my stomach. :(
Smiley, I already approved this comment. You can take three days off for trolling.
I can accept "act". Sure.
lol - I love that they're basically making them look like terrible people here :)
"Technically, everyone you can have sex with is someone's child..."
These are things you should know. But you are happily within a cult and wouldn't dare think for yourself right? Or can't...idk. Too far indoctrinated?
Lets make up for it by having sex with me in a sauna lol
I think they're called "graphic novels" now.
Evolution doesn't happen at all, and never did. Speciation is NOT evolution.
Do they have the names of those vile hate spewers who work at the New York Times?
Them things I listed are all part of physical urges.
correct on the numbers. You final comment requires substantiation.
That's what's up.
And I deeply disagree. They were definitely trying to make a religion-free government and let the nation's citizens have the freedom to worship Whomever they wanted in whatever way they wanted, or not at all.
Sure he did...On the road to Damascus.
Big, huge maybe.
Empiricists hold that
Madam Blavatsky was a charlatan and a cult leader, not a peer-reviewed scholar. For some legit info on Mithraism, I would recommend "The Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism" by Franz Cumont, which you can find here:
i hope so, but you can never know with our current leader.
It is so because Anti-theists are against religion, not science (regardless of what you might have decided what things may say to you). They are also made up of theists or atheists.
That is not context from the chapter, that is interpretation based on extrinsic evidence.
That is splitting hairs. No, the jury has no relevance whatsoever. God has proven Himself. That you refuse to accept it is your own fault due to your pride in yourself. Men do not prove God, and never could. Creation alone is evidence enough for His existence, aside from the fact that He has made it plain and clear to everyone. Your denials do not give you an exemption from God's own rules