And yet in modern day terms, this is how the conception appears.
What if it were just her own personal preference? The motivation behind discrimination should be irrelevant to whether it's legal, IMO. And you can't sue just for "discrimination." It has to be illegal.
actually a very smart idea... Un has a good relationship with Rodman... Rodman has a good relationship with Trump. Ergo... no reason NOT have Rodman aid in the peace process...
How is it cowardly to attack someone who owns guns?
Can you cite your independent, peer-reviewed sources on that?
LMAO, Pence will NEVER be president. I applaud your zeal, but you clearly don't know what is happening.
As long as its a good, flattering cut, who cares, long or short? I trusted my wife to know far better than me what would look ok for my girls, knowing she had reasonable standards of tastes and wouldn't permit some bizarre cut.
They're both kids
Throughout history, every empire has lasted roughly 250 years (10 generations) or six ages that define revolutionary changes. The last age, the age of decadence represents the motives of Trump supporters that deliberately distort the truth in order to promote chaos within society. Most Trump supporters are miserable or destitute and are determined to share that pain with their fellow citizens by any means necessary. It's the only form of recognition they can obtain but they perpetuate it without actually understanding the consequences.
Winston Churchill is holding up NAFTA?
The category is religion, is it not?! From what I can see you?re not a woman so what is your personal experience with being pregnant, labour or even having a child? I?m Catholic so I believe in God. I never said anything about God?s will, you did. The situations you refer to are caused by man (as in mankind), nature, or a combination of the two. A child should always be considered a blessing and if a woman or young girl needs support, they should get it. Abortion is not the answer. No doubt you are a relativist...relativism is self-refuting. There are absolute truths and killing an innocent child is intrinsically evil whether you are a religious person or not, it makes no difference. Have you studied philosophy or theology at all? You might find it interesting along with some Church History. Perhaps it is you who is the intransigent or bigot? Or perhaps you just have too much time on your hands and like a good argument. I wish you well and leave you with these:
omg, I am so sorry! if you can restore trust, then try (depending on how old your kids are). but I know for a fact, broken trust is very hard to fix. I'd have to move on because my anxiety would never allow me to relax again
What science facts does Christianity deny? What is a churchman?
Oooh. what's it called?
Thank you, President Trump, for looking out for the best interests of the American people.
Why should "King Sargon" be the ONLY babe "placed in a basket on a river?" Just askin.
on my way with moar melatonin
I never said Mary was without sin. *SMH*
I wouldn't tap something that crazy even with a rented dick.
Okay, so bottom line here...did the SC overturn the decision? The answer is yes. As such, he should be able to sue for losses and damages. He has been cleared of all wrong doing by the highest court in the land, has he not? Or did I miss the part where the SC ordered it back to the HRT and asked them not to consider his religious beliefs in such a negative light? Seeing as that was the crux of the matter, his religious beliefs, it would be hard to prove he wasn't being asked to surrender his religious principles in order to satisfy someone else's principles. That, it would seem, sets a pecking order for human rights, and that's a pretty slippery slope. What if a brown man accuses a black woman of something? Does brown trump black? Or does woman trump man? Do religious rights trump someone else's right to have a wedding cake made at a specific shop, when there are literally hundreds of other options for them?
You upvoted the sick and disgusting comments of "God Bless America." Bourdain did nothing to deserve your petulant disdain.
Ok. Forget the fact that he's an idiot. Please answer my question.
BLECCCH!!! Who in the hell puts salt on watermelon?!! Just nasty!!
Its a justified concern. I guess that would be an example of "rational fear"
a thoughtful comment, cam. I agree 100.
If I based my religion on my dreams it would be one funky religion. :)
Singling out one company with extra taxes, because they do something not to the liking of the POTUS. So much for goverment interference with business being a democrat/ socialistic thing.
For true random people, unless they are connected with someone I am, I usually don?t respond. I?ve met a few people i appreciate being able to bounce some ideas off of so i like that aspect. But it?s the ones from people i don?t know and aren?t familiar with, i pass. It?s not MySpace you now. Regardless if it?s just connect or to meet and discuss a new business venture (I get that a lot, and it comes off scammy like it?s an email from a Nigerian prince lol.
I check into Facebook occasionally but that?s it.
People with privilege do not have to worry. That is what privilege is. That is surely why you can't even acknowledge it. Nobody worries that you have privilege. People without it worry about things that you don't have to worry about.
Yes, it's the legalness of it that bothers me, not the fact that she was hurt. I think we all have sensitive topics. Talk about feelings instead of issuing orders.
Which is a good reason for atheist outrage.
The ancient Israelites, as the Jews today, did not major on afterlife.
I love that all you do is repeat that stuff and ignore the rest.