The real satisfaction, though it will come at a price, will be to watch Ford's supporters suffer, as their wages decline, jobs decline, EI gets cut, welfare ends and healthcare become privatized.
probably not, especially when Jesus eludes to the OT but what if they just agreed they are teaching stories? Even the horrendous drowning of children would take on a different meaning because we would know it didn;t ACTUALLY happen
Truth: cut the indoctrination you have been subjected to. Instead of His Word, you cite and quote Man's wisdom from Universities.
You make a good point about him holding off for you before he finishes. I've never faked it, but I have given him some cues that I'm good and it's OK to wrap it up.
Well, she still banged him. All she was seeing was $$$$$$$. What man would want to boink her now; after she humped that orange anus.
Heard it yesterday. It's "laurel".
join meetup? start doing activities with people who have similar interest?
When the fish are testing positive for opiods, yeah.
I can understand that.
You will have to ask him- I?m using his words to conform to his context.
I can't help but think of us as being special... Special in the sense that we can even contemplate/entertain the question in the first place.
Is this Mika B from MSNBC? Sounds word for word like what she says everyday on her lowly rated show...! D.N.C talking points much?
Don?t know anyone who wouldn?t choose the baby
So you're saying you were in the wrong after all? lolol
I fear the water is warming & the frog is enjoying himself. Great quote.
"you would say I had interfered with free will."
What kind of a sorry contract was used that didn't make it clear what the costs would be? How can there be confusion between $300 and $3,500?
It has not been wrong, just not pinpoint accurate. Tested objects don't come with a date stamped on them.
Hey, we judge all the time. When we vote, when we make new friends, when we decide that some have to go...to judge is a part of life. God calls us to be wise. God bless
wrong about what? I just agreed with your "bad law" comment. XD
The alternative is complicity in victimization.
False. Its a safety and hygiene issue. It would be like arguing people have a right to TIG weld anywhere they wish. Their god given right to TIG weld shall not be infringed lol
Really has to do with kids and then assets. A person would not have kids with a man if they know the male can just leave and take everything with him. Marriage is some protection to women it is not about control. A woman can always leave.
True justice would have him tried, convicted, and executed.
I don't know exactly why. I don't think its all social conditioning. I do know it starts young. like before the age of 10. A boy, most of the time will just push, shove, or even punch when something doesn't go right. Then they are over it. I remember my childhood where we would get into fistfights and be over it half an hour later. Rubbed some dirt on it, got a drink from the hose, on to the next topic. Girls, as I remember, would get catty and hold grudges. They would cut each other down verbally in ways where, frankly, I'd rather have gotten punched.. I do remember that later, the bigger bullies (boys) would start using the cut downs and by high school they were every bit as vicious as I remember the girls being. Now, take the tendency to want to use your hands to settle stuff from before high school. Add a huge dose of hormones and insecurity and rejection. But you know you can't just use your fists, so you reach for an equalizer...A gun, a bomb, whatever.
AC. What may behind the scene is the undisciplined imagination of ancient and uneducated barbarians with us often taught, and used as bribes and threats to manipulate the obedience and compliance of dependent children.
Who knew bakers had so much power?
Do you think scientists change the way they do things in order to cover up erroneous data? Or do you think they change their methods because they found a better method? Hint: this is not a trick question. The scientific method searches endlessly for more accurate data. Criticizing scientists for following the process is anti-science.
You just may be thinking I have a point. ?? ??
They are isolated in their numbers, but they are growing. The baker, the fast food chicken chain, the hobby store, are just recent examples of Americans who fought back using not bullets, but the Law, to make their stand against not only leftist, but increasingly, the late-liberal ideologies. Their violence however, particularly when organized,will increasingly be be met in kind when it arises.