Call the car throwing away prevention hotline first.
Which one is that?
See- this is how it works. If you just throw something out there as if it proves me wrong- the burden is on you to actually make an argument.
So canine instinct is a designed trait specific to dogs but environment can corrupt instinct?
Or if you steal a loaf of bread to feed your family vs. stealing something because you're greedy you'll get a different sentence. Or if you kill someone in self defense vs. killing someone out of anger. The guy's still dead but the sentence is situational. Always has been. That's as it should be. You think that the sentence should always be exactly the same irrespective of the circumstances? That's ridiculous. My daughter punched a bully in the face once. I didn't punish her, I lauded her. If she was the bully I'd have lowered the boom on her. Same action, different circumstances. This is a sign of a just society.
Pizza party at Disneyland's Hall of Presidents. Would be Chuck E Cheese, but they removed their robots.
I have asked the same question to believers multiple times. "Why can't you just admit that your belief is illogical?" Just stay out of reasoning (which you aren't good at anyway) and proudly claim "I have faith." (Which you put above reason anyway)
You turned your back on Zeus first.
Sounds quite Marxist
Yeah that's total BS - women like that should be shot :(
"should lead you to cheating on your wife when the opportunity arises" - claiming this again and again isn't going to make it true.
it depends on what type of crime you are analyzing, violent crime no . but other categories of crime white yes whites do dominate
...how did I lie? Unmoral infers the subject is aware of the concept of morality just not influenced or concerned by it.
"Simona Sharoni, a professor of women's and gender studies"
A seven to two decision. I wonder which leftists came over the the religious side, and could they be doing this to further Islam down the road?
Ruben...test it against history...many accounts. Practically empirical evidence. You are testing a single source God. Test, retest with multiple even secular accounts. its enough
We have consumer protection laws for everything except religion. Essentially anything goes as far as religious claims. And if you can convince someone to give you 10 percent, 30 percent, or 80 percent of their income to your organization, so what. That money is theirs and is not taxable.
It's not unique to situations involving females and the fact that she claimed it means that she has lost credibility in my eyes. I won't read her posts anymore because now we know what her agenda really is.
STAY OUT OF THE INFIELD!
What a jolly jig! Don't forget your shots, now!