I suppose you are right and I can see how it can be misconstrued that I align with this group. I will change it. cheers.
Still writing, kid... try to use English, so you don't look so ignorant.
I think you'll find that the gospels are full of analogies and parables actually Andy. Stop being so fundie.
Unfortunately, you'd be wrong. A lot of atheists are public about it because they enjoy the rage-ahol a little too much. They just want to be angry at Christians, and no amount of sophisticated or critical thinking is going to take away that wish.
"The domesticated species are defective copies of their wild ancestors. "
Then that?ll be the red. ;)
You do if you criticize them for not doing so, for living excessively. You judge...so take some judgement too.
Which parts? You can take a herd of cattle and selectively breed them to make black, brown, white, long hair, short hair, long horn, short horn etc. You can not selectively breed them and make an elk, a turtle, bird, or anything other than a cow. That's where Darwinism fails. Selective breeding can not produce a different 'kind' of organism. If you breed cows, all their offspring will be cows. That is a scientific fact.
on my way with moar melatonin
Admittedly, Latin isn't my strong suit. Nonetheless, what you're doing is playing with words in an attempt to shift the burden of proof where it clearly doesn't belong.
I think both of them should be able to shoot their mouths off and say whatever the fvck they want.
What's the best way to ride a horse... facing forwards or backwards?
This is about the court case. I will report you.
Why "reduced"? How does a clever play on words detract from the message?
HaHa a well deserved one, I'll bet.
Evidence of what? Your morality may not be his morality. If you don't have the same morality that he does then you are viewed as immoral. So he was correct. What evidence are you looking for? Do you think there is some scientific study that shows what is moral? There is no moral scientific graph. Asking for evidence of a personal belief is like asking for evidence that your favorite color is green. Where did you even come up with this evidence of morals thing?
I could never live in an HOA community. Telling people how to decorate their homes for a major holiday is going too far.
I don't wish for an untimely end, only that the Lord would take him home soon.. ??
Explain "lack of ability"
Try sharing a Coke with him.
I wrote almost the same thing a few seconds later!
?It?s because I am an idiot?.
He perhaps wanted to be accepted...but ultimately got rejected....by everyone. Banned by Harlem Shake and hopefully soon he'll lose his job at Rutgers.
Oh please! They were always anti-Jew. All the prominent Jews were assassinated or marginalized.
That?s the reason Amy Schumer gave fit breaking up with dolph ziggler
Seems probable, but before we turn this into a contest I just want to be clear that I make these points because I find it peculiar how we pick and chose which people we vilify for the same or worse actions. Not to absolve anyone of wrongdoing.
So your answer is my questions are irrelevant? Are you implying that you don't have an answer? Please, don't leave us guessing! Why did man deem them to be harmful? If that is too hard of a question, here is one that may be easier - how do you know that morality came from humans interacting with humans?
None at all, its just a deflection from a lost argument
Because it has.
Embryos yes. Two of three triplets is totally different. You can morally deliberately kill an embryo. Even if there is no harm to a woman from an embryo or a fetus, neither is a person and doesn't have the same rights as the woman. As the fetus matures to the point where it is viable on its own, then it could be considered a person and the rights of each balance each other. If you draw the line for person good before that, then don't get an abortion if you don't want one. I don't see how an argument from harm works for a fetus. They are not harmed. They are not losing anything because they are not a he or she yet. What is the harm to them before 24 weeks? No pain, no memory, no awareness, no consciousness, no anything to be taken from them. You draw the line way before the woman's rights to self determination, privacy, or safety can even be challenged.
Overall it's a fair opinion but ? there are many humanistic interpersonal interactions that offer healthy psychological comfort and coping that do not include mythology. The pool of people who are likely to endorse such is still relatively small.
You didn't answer the question. But you brought your opinion.