All valid points, but none negate that Nuclear Energy is the surest cleanest form of power generation.
"And it doesn't say anything about there being nothing."
That is probably the case, yes. But the question was specifically a rock, not the energy from which the rock was formed. That's the distinction I'm making.
So when you said before:
This is probably the most nuanced argument in favor I've read.
Family Guy had a parody of How I Met Your Mother where Barney's character asks Ted if he thinks it is weird that a single guy in his late 20's is constantly thinking about marriage instead of getting laid.
Ah, delusional too, eh? Well, I won't pretend to be surprised.
I recommend this book...
most of them know too much, they won't tell until after the fact!!!
How the logic of a discussion about trying to illustrate the difference between a crime involving death, and violence, and that of a possibly inappropriate campaign contribution can pass by a brain without being processed logically is beyond my capability to understand. Having to try and have a logical discussion with a Liberal is as effective as pounding your forehead on a cinder block, and ends with a very similar headache as the only consequence I give. You need to be careful walking as I imagine with that brain it is hard to remember that one foot has to go in front of another.
Whew! Finally... Are you the bman who's also on Premier? (I was banned from there on Monday, and given no explanation - it took me days to find out DavidS and T.S were behind it, and I thought Anna Nemo had done the same to you here as I couldn't find your post to reply to. I was Emma Dove, so if anyone there wonders why I have suddenly vanished that's why)
Nobody ever follows that rule, do they?
Take a simple example: The IRS "scandal" under Obama. Facts are that it wasn't really a scandal and everything the IRS did was above board, had been done for years and yet, heads rolled. The right tried to make it into a Nixon era scandal. The left seems to know now there was really nothing to it. But, when presented with the facts, no one will change positions on it. The right firmly believes the Clintons took money from Russia and then Hillary sold them uranium. No matter how much they look at the facts, the right says she did and the left says she had little or nothing to do with it and the three events (donations, speeches and uranium) are not connected. I am almost to the point of believing the quote: "The truth is what people will believe." I'll go with your "most" since I'm not a great believer in absolutes. But, I'd like to see someone change an opinion sometime instead of just trying to reinforce what they already believe.
Businesses have the right to discriminate. The right doesn't care if you kick them out of your restaurant, because the free market will correct it. The neighbors will hear of your ugly policy and not buy your product. It will have repercussions, in the free market. The left wants to use the SUPREME COURT to legislate that YOU HAVE TO SERVE everyone like you are a slave. There is only hypocrispy in the poor gilded mind of a person who believes that:
lol You crazy gurl!!
Which denomination, which church, has the correct interpretation of the bible?
Different immune systems.
of course, the first video on MTV.
About 1/4 acre. Beautiful trees. I would only like the price tag if I were selling tho
Except when they aren't.
If that's not the implication, then I don't see how the question relates to the data...
If you jump down the stairs backwards while singing "Mary had a little lamb" after unprotected sex, you can't get pregnant. Facts.
Imaginary creatures can't do anything so no...they can't stop chariots
No jet plane for the pastor? How utterly barbaric!
Damn, I told that kid not to pick up guns!
As I have said all the time schools have one purpose and that is education. Some people value their child's education and it does not include a religious indoctrination.
It might be, if you can cite which scroll that comes from and then present an argument as to the date and sectarian affiliation of the scroll in question. The DSS are not particularly useful for generalizing about Judaism. If you showed that the scroll in question was pre-Christian and was definitely referring to the Messiah, that would technically validate your original claim. However, that would not be evidence that Jews in general equated the Messiah with the Son of God.
What on earth are you on about? Did you not read my last sentence?
anyone else would have delayed the arrival until the next day so that the effect would be maximized. instead, trump let them get home sooner. not only that, but he came to them, he waited for them to arrive, not the other way around. he made the press get up/stay up to cover this and denied the big press guys (cooper, madow, hannity) the opportunity to be the one that brought the story to their viewers. he also used it to troll the press. and sense you hate how he did, we love it cuz it gets y'all all worked up. just. like. everything. else.
Oh, and by the way, if I misrepresent what you said, then it would seem that in light of a good conversation you would correct me since you think it is obvious that I misunderstood what you were saying. It's not like this form of communication is bullet proof. Sometimes people get things wrong. That is why we take our time and try and discuss things, so we both can get closer to what is the truth.
We had a good discussion about this about a month ago. "Why didn't Buddhism go West."
My dog farted the world into existence. Makes just about as much sense. Actually at least my dog exists so more so.
Big huge hugs back!????