That's the model for practically every religion so that the priests can keep control.
You can?t even handle your own life !
So, any ideas on zakat? I have suggested to start with defining the doctrine sources on it.
DID YOU NOT READ what Ezekiel said?!?
No, you don't got it it would seem.
But rhinoceros unicornis is a unicorn
Very, very simple answer, Stefy: these discussions are in English, and countries where English is the primary language are all Christian-majority countries. Go on Arabic Disqus and you'll find more criticisms of Islam. Go on Chinese Disqus and you'll find more criticisms of Buddhism. Go on Gujerati Disqus and you'll find more criticisms of Hinduism (there may not actually be Disqus forums for these languages, but I think you get my point).
From Merriam Webster
So Raw Story (snicker) says that the NY Post (suddenly credible with the left) says that an un-named source told them this? Enjoy.
I'll agree with that. I'll also say that it would seem that the strong men of the world wars toiled in hopes that one day, their kind would be made extinct by a lack of need for them.
For some years back I had a constant heartrate of 45.No symptoms and no explanation. I am not a great athlete .Any ideas?
But again, there are assumptions in your OP that the eco system is wasteful, but theists and even evolutionists would argue that it's perfectly designed and balanced. If you have too much or too little of one species or another, it could be thrown off balance. For example, the insects and flowers need each other for polination and we benefit from the honey. Ants have a lot of useful benefits including turning the soil and keeping other common insects like flies and bed bugs in check by eating their eggs. Anteaters keep ant population under control, and list goes on...
I find it objectionable that even 2 SCOTUS justices would think the state of Colorado forcing people to work against their will through threat of fining, etc. is OK.
Ok. No problem. This will need a lot of knowledge. A whole elephant needs to be eaten. We will have to do it bit by bit.
I consider blocking you, but I forgive too easily. ??????
Shame, dogs will look after kids like their own, I assume it was a puppy?
Alright... let's assume that Humanism took off as a philosophy in Rome, and that's why there was no rise of Christianity.
Yeah, I saw that article and my reply to it detailed how it not only does not dismiss gradualism, but fits quite well into the model I described above, ie PE in periods of environmental upheaval and gradualism in periods of relative stability.
nope. I just finished a semester with a women's studies course and it was nothing like that.
I took a touring test... 38 people on a bus... For 10 days... In China...
How could He not have been there. Since He is here now?
coming from the nanny state lol!
It may be evidence against the Genesis account if the Genesis account is taken word for word literally, but not if taken figuratively. The point of the Genesis accounts is not how the world was created, or how long it took, but by Whom.
So your father was gay? I bet you are too, at 3 am.
That so? I'd love to know the Bible passage that mentions Halloween.
He's pulling his in, the alien lefty is pushing his out!
oh yeah the life of luxury lmao. Come on man.
He's says that when someone straight up owns him with facts.
Not a Christian by a long shot, either.
Do you want to get cheated on again?
The first excuse once kept whites and blacks from marrying. Now you're using to gays from marrying.
I'm running at you with a knife. You can legally kill me but I was just really, really excited to show you the knife.
So it's basically a zoo and none of the kids who are actually interested in learning can do so because everyone else is clowning around nonstop.
Now that you understand the real scale, are you a 50?
Reading Matthew Chapters one and two, confirms that your statements about Matthew's account are incorrect. Verse 18 does NOT say that Mary was already pregnant when Joseph met her. Also, your statement about "it does not say she is a virgin" is blatantly false. Verse 25 plainly tells us that Mary was a virgin until after the birth of Jesus. A rigid dogmatic assertion? Definitely, because that is what the Word says. Baseless? Hardly. Your post is refuted by the truth.