Fox is garbage. About time the right started to turn on it. Also I saw this guy being interviewed and he said Donald Trump is a danger to the constitution and his supporters can't admit they are wrong. Again he is a republican and retired military officer.
Meaning no proof at all. You've tried this before.
Show god exists. If you cant show its true then you don't know its true. Science doesn't assert that which it cant show true- as true. Why do you think your "knowledge" gets a pass? Why do you think yours doesn't need to be falsifiable- that's how we overcome our own fallibility... we don't just go with what we like or what seems most comforting. Fun fact: there are lots of philosophers far more versed in metaphysics and epistemology who came to a far different conclusion about deities than yourself. As one so put it-
No, they aren't evidence. THey're arguments. Arguments of why they believe in Santa. Anecdote. But as stated before, that isn't evidence.
Lets look at this a different way, you keep asking me to prove it I can't anymore than you can prove it was conferred though evolutionary process. If it could be proven either way we would not be having this discussion. It comes down to a preponderance of evidence through many fields of Science. You reject all evidence, that of course is your choice. You asked for evidence and I gave it to you, you exist and science has no idea why. If you hold to a naturalist world view you are stuck with evolutionary process to reach the state you are today. The problem is there is not enough time in the existence of the universe for life to randomly generate conscientiousness. The probability of random spontaneous conscientiousness generation is akin to writing down all spoken word onto pieces of paper throwing them in the air and when they land, they form the entire encyclopedia Britannica on the first try. So yes at this time I cannot prove God anymore than you can prove evolution but the probability for my premise is far more likely than yours.
No, I?m not using circular reasoning. I?m not trying to prove the Bible. What I am saying is those who call themselves Christians but don?t accept parts of the Bible aren?t following what the Bible says about itself. They are making up their own religion...and their own god.
Those are the words of paul, not GOD.
If a labradoodle is half labrador retriever and half poodle...
This is so central Florida. Space shuttles, cutting edge rockets that land on their tails and swamp buggy monster trucks.
NDP a government for the people.
And you live in a majority Christian nation, so two of those three still apply to you.
This is not about "two types"...you Democrats love moving goal posts, deflecting ans starting narratives.
Or confident man is shot down because the woman senses his underlying douchebaggery lol
My first gyno at 16 was a male. My mom saw and him took me too him. So I started seeing one immediately. But with health, you should do what makes YOU comfortable
They in fact did repeal the ban. Good for them.
Being arbitrary is not unreasonable. What exceptions do you accept? What punishment besides mandatory birth do you foresee for women who do not meet your limitations?
I stated facts. Gradualism and natural selection are not the means to which lifes diversity came about. Find one example seen genetically where its continuous. Find one example of a newly created species as in split on that tree of life depicting common descent all life. Its just not seen.