LOL what flavor
I'm just waiting on Rev and Eman to use it in their rants without any understanding of what the content actually says.
No it does not contradict my point. You tried to equate environmental regulation (which we're well aware of thanks) with the right to our own labor, goods, and services. It was a non-sequitur, terrible analaogy, fail.
A lot of atheists would like to use Christianity as shield against Islam. It, however, was not meant for that so far as I can tell. A secular society creates a spiritual vacuum, and Islam is more than happy to fill the void. They have done so with remarkable success in Europe.
I have not. It's interesting but I think this is part of the issue when men understanding why women don't come forward. Men are used to being believed when they speak. Women speak, no matter what the topic and their credibility must be earned
From the convincing idea of a separate Self, we build our house of cards.
I accused you of nothing, I stated a question that arose from possible implications of your unwillingness to answer my questions. You've proven only that you are not willing to ask reasonable questions. Very impressive.
SoS. As I said before I read all your post earlier went back 4 years, then you took a two year break and I saw the repetitive patterns and the same phrases being used. I posted about this previously .
I tried to examine the objective scientific evidence for the existence of christian version of god. Seeing as they have repeatedly refused to provide any objective scientific evidence, I must answer with big fat ZERO.
Butt, everyone's doing it! Or I just saw the remake of CHIP.
When I go into the lab next door to my office to tell the kids in there to keep the noise down, should I say:
Not sure what you are implying. Are you saying that women shouldn't be covered by health insurance when they are pregnant?
"as long as you admit the fact that obama raised the national debt by 10 trillion dollars"
I think in my case it was because I wasn't raised in a very religious household. Clearly the definition applies in that venue. So the more pedestrian association of anal was the one more mentioned. I did know that it applied to both sexes.
Isaiah 34:14, either in singular or plural form according to variations in the earliest manuscripts. In the Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q510-511,
It's "you are" = "You're."
The burden off proof lies at the feet of those making outrageous claims.
Many people in the comments today are either biased towards trans people or biased against religious people (or more accurately, their actions bc of their religion). I'd
Sure I can
I am heterosexual. When I marry, it will be to one woman, and I will be her only husband. That's what is right for me.
I guess you haven't listened to Rachel Maddow and her ridiculous conspiracy theories against Trump. And what about the coverage of where is Malania. Or what about the kids in a cage which was under Obama and not Trump. Most of what Hannity talks about is things that are out in the public which aren't being reported by the left stream media. I guess we'll find out the truth when the IAG report comes out. The stuff that has already come out though has Comey and McCabe in big trouble and if McCabe isn't guilty then why does he want immunity. They have tried to rid of Hannity for years and it won't work. The people he has on his show know and are respected lawyers and some are even ex FBI people so they would know the truth.
I have been saying this for some time now, at least FOR the US...religious exemptions are unnecessary. I don't believe the religious have the right to special accommodations. As long as they have the ability to worship the God of their choice, which requires them to adhere to certain tenets and those tenets do not pose a threat to our democracy then it should be allowed. Otherwise, the same laws that apply to a non believer apply to me.
for seven years
Read down the thread for it.
Yes, criticizing her career choice based on your personal, but irrelevant, beliefs about "appropriate" female sexuality is misogynistic. It's not your place to define "appropriate" for her--nor for anyone besides yourself.
I know, I laughed too. Left it for you to find.
No Sir, I must disagree.
NO, but to YHVH God they are.
I think that most religious people?s objection to abortion is based on the idea that a fetus (and even a fertilized egg) has ?a soul.? These same people often support the death penalty, and war, and the inhumane treatment and slaughter of other (non-human) animals to eat, and some even eat those animals? unborn fetuses or babies (veal, although that doesn?t seem to be as popular now as it once was, and lamb).
That same article states the average wedding costs $35,000. Who are they surveying?
Trump is licking Putin's boots again.
Guess you are a flat earther
its not an opinion. But sure.