Better to work a second job that take money from those who work.
It's not like he called Ivanka a "feckless c."
Kitt just turn on this scan mode
We also have the community of Rooster Poot.
It isn't bigotry to point out bigotry, it isn't racist to point out racism either, nor 'anti-white' and so on. I doubt you have any idea what objective truth is, objective truth basically just means a fact - something that is true for everybody regardless. I did not fail to take into account context, the context within which your many derogatory and racist comments were made is obvious. As for humor? no I do not find bigotry / racism / xenophobia humours and i think it is sad you do,. Goodbye.
So you're in favor of screwing Public Accommodation laws?
But yeah, I?ll go with that.
And if you would prefer me to present my position first, let me know. I would just need more time than Friday. And if you aren't cool with email, let me know. There are other options on disqus that I can figure out, not sure how easy they are to set up as I haven't done that.
Then we agree.
It is a simple question.
I can tell you one thing. They are very surprised if you suggest to them that they are not Christian.
Yeah, I took your word for it already. But you quoted something that shows it's argued as a cultural practice, and not using the same reasons as male circumcision.
No examples. Got it.
If people don't really die but move on to an afterlife, why did God tell us not to kill?
IKR Separation anxiety in disguise?
Two people asked you which god... because not everyone's god is under the definition you gave. Perhaps be more verbose.
All of that isn't evidence of a god, let alone your god. You can claim it is all you like, but the people who study that stuff professionally haven't actually suggested that god is proven through this stuff.
won't that answer just fall along 'party' lines?
The teachings attributed to him are largely irrelevant in today's society, but, if you think they have value, fine.
Are you using the rule to get them back because you love them or to get them back so that you can dump them? I know someone who employed it for the latter reason. She didn't slip up once and went out looking super fly in locations where he and his friends sometimes visited. He ended up chasing her down and asking her back out. She went only so she could dump him. I felt like that was a lot of effort but to each his own.
Latin doesn't save your argument. I posted a reasonable interpretation of the art, if tongue-in-cheek. I'm not saying that popular beliefs are true.
That doesn't strike me as a persuasive reason for atheists to start from the same point.
When did GOD YHWH say this?
That argument is tired and horribly flawed. The vast majority of Muslims do not believe in jihad, the destruction of infidels, world caliphates, etc. Don't bother quoting me from the Quran and pretending you know that all Muslims are supposed to obey centuries old words while the similar words in the Bible are considered metaphors or allegories. SMH
Sure, maybe it's hyperbole. Or, more likely, something someone just made up. Of course, it's not presented that way and nothing in the text gives you reason to think that they wanted you to take it as hyperbole. If what your scripture says bothers you, maybe you should reconsider believing in it, calling it the Good Book, and basing your life around it. I know I did.
Ah, but that's not the analogy.
From that web site:
Ever driven even a single mile an hour over the speed limit?
THE FEELS! THE GOD DAMNED FEELS!!
So the Last Supper never happened?