You are implying that your god actually is necessary in science by arguing against all the scientific evidence we have that your god isn't necessary for science to function.
There is one down below. Made the discussion for me.
And she said that she wanted lots of kids! Lol
Both statements have value. They answer different questions.
Well first off, my quip "confirms to me" only means my opinion. Nothing more.
Should mail Israel a red button and quit answering the phone for a week.
That's less of a gap then any other ancient person between their death and historical writings about them. Not to mention it means the people who knew him and witnessed his life were still around, and, in fact, were authoring the writings about him.
You know what? I ought to just go ahead and do the same. He's a useless pain in the ass, lol.
True - and that's also how they've ended up owning a god of the gaps which atheists can then use to prove their deity doesn't exist. It's...a fatal flaw, really. And since science owns the mantle of adaptability especially since the evolution argument began, religious zealots have painted themselves into a corner of rigidity.
when dd they ake out the robots?
Actually, the God of the Jews is much more loving than the God of the Christians... God of the Christians is not forgiving at all, he requires Jesus punished for your sins... which by the way goes against everything the God of the Jews desired. The Jewish God ?saves those who are broken-hearted and crushed in spirit?... now thats love.
Oh well if you want to know? I believe that Christians who spew evil, who spew hate, who demand that LGBT's, Atheists and Pagans and others be put to death, or imprisoned? Simply because they cherry pick buybull verses to go along with their hate, bigotry, misogyny? Should be given the treatment of what is called for in their buybull and have done unto them as what they want to do unto others, and see just how the hell they like it.
We would be celebrating another nobel prize.
I agree but then I don't put a lot of weight in the classic Christian theology.
Ok. That works....
Yeah , your point is?
Religion came first, right?
I do understand Andy, & cautiously make & respond to comments. I am
I stand corrected. I should have said:
What is 'I'?
"Are you really going to take the position that humans do not possess more value than a tuna or a squirrel?" In a tribal way they are more valuable, but in a cosmic way they are not more special and in a biological way there are arguments to be made that we do have some special traits but many species do which is why as a whole you should point out factors that may make a difference.
you know that dog is an american indian dish..