Enough to support a family - and as cost of living varies by area there is no set standard.
Would that be the same set of values Arnaud Amalric has based his famous quote upon?
he readily admits he did. Why would you call god a liar?
i've seen it. five at five is essentially "the view" with less estrogen. i'm gonna have to pass.
Well, maybe. "Gulp"
Nope. It is just the natural course of humans in their "godly existence".
Since every study on it shows science doesn't need god.
IF you have verified evidence for the proposition THEN no faith is required. The only time you have to accept a proposition on faith is if you do NOT have verifiable evidence. It's true that once you have verifiable evidence then you can conclude that your faith in that proposition was well-founded. But if you already have that verifiable evidence, there's no need to take the proposition on faith.
Well if he does that will overcome alot of problems
being a former smoker i agree!!!
If you think name calling is in anyway changing history, your wrong
I did, in my op, I said that it?s unconstitutional for churches to have a superior status of tax exemption simply because they?re religious, and I backed it up using the first amendment. You then said they should be exempt if charitable or religious, which I pointed out your charity claim as moot. Afterwards you said it?s because they are nonprofit, and started bringing up tax returns of orange gods, which I pointed out as a straw man. I asked you why non-profit deserves tax exemption if it?s not for charity, as many non-profits pay a variety of taxes, and now your mumbling about getting trapped. This wasn?t a trap. I made my point at the very beginning. You just seem out of your depth. Having to recap our own conversation for you is evidence of that. See how the claim and evidence demonstration works now?
No doubt it was the popular name for baby boys in that day.
Ah so rather than having evidence that any of this is wrong, you just pretend that it'll be overthrown because..... why?
Yes, because in the actual oral presentations of the case the concept of compelled speech was at the forefront of the case. SCOTUS has ruled in the past that the government cannot compel you to utter or create speech that you disagree with.
I don't disagree with what Ron said here.
So you at arguing that if you feel the end justifies the means, it is acceptable to offer inadequate medical care? Geesh, we could save a lot of money by getting rid of all of those licensing and quality control standards. Let's start with your grand children's pediatric clinic. Most of them will be fine without actual medical care... And perhaps we could save tax money by eliminating standards for Medicare and Tricare reimbursed facilities. I bet the high school dropout sweeping the floors at McDonald's could offer cheap services. And hey, Medicare are just old people anyway. Why would it matter if a few of them died a little bit earlier, right? Standards for medical care don't matter, after all...
We do not care what it means to you; we do not worship you. We care what it means to YHVH God, because we worship Him.
The Republicans control Congress and the White House, not the Democrats.
I don't know, actually. God never came into existence. Never ends either.
Sometimes and sometimes it can make more likely to be a bully which is why I said its individual. There is a certain kind of person with all the power that would not take advantage and they are people who would.
If something is resistant to change, it usually stagnates and eventually either becomes inert or it dies.
So all you know how to do is copy and paste? That's exactly the same thing you said earlier. I responded to that already. Do you not know how to come up with a new response that isn't already pre-written for you?
21% tariff on all imports same as the corporate tax would be nice.
Nope. same thing. Less emotional nonsense...less sentimentalism....more conversation and data to help formulate a solution.
Wall street goes up and it goes down. Over the long haul it mostly goes up. Under Trump's watch so far its mainly gone up. If you believe you alone can predict it tanking you are delusional.
Would you call Rosanne's tweets hateful?
With the present state of Christian apostasy and heresy, it really matters little who is in charge, so to speak. Men generally are certain that they need the approval of other "gifted" men to act on what God speaks to them, and unless approved and supported by the "system" that is in place, you will not be received.