"Fetuses aren't human beings yet"
Existence is a bivalent condition, like "true" or "false." To reject "true" is necessarily to accept, and thus claim, "false". So too with existence.
They might ?think? that, yes.
Cool if you truly feel that way. Usally it's only about hate for one side or the other. What ever group is in the wh will get the hate from the other side. The fun part too me is when they both pull the same crap but some of the members of one side are blind to that fact and can only see fault in the other side. What we truly need is new rules and laws on the hooks if the ones we have are not working.
You have been fooled by smoke and mirrors. The big picture is that both administrations kept consolidating wealth in fewer hands, both are hawks and interventionists militarily, and neither respect the constitution. And if the leadership of the Dems doesn't change, no matter how they wring their hands at Trump's draconian policies, none will be changed substantially. I've been watching this same bee ess show for thirty years.
How about an open handed slap?
At least something was hot in Kauffman Stadium this year!
As I understand it:
Trump, the rude and insulting bore, made his way through the G-7 Summit, showing up late and leaving early. I hope he doesn't make his way back to the US.
But if a white guy says, obama won because he was black... that would be racist.
To the realization that we will never win them over, we must outnumber, out-maneuver and out-vote them. There is no peace between a Trump cultist and any patriotic American. There never will be. There never can be.
Only if you want to just believe all that is written. That's like me saying that everything in the Harry Potter novels must be true.
True, I just think Christianophobia expresses it better.
How about this situation:
Why are we asking only about the decline of Christianity?
"if not violence." Again, just as dramatic. There was no violence. Quit trying to make up a victim narrative.
Too optimistic. 1%. No more.
Since they were both involved in rebel actions against violent establishments themselves, why would you even ask such a question? Do you deny that the establishments they confronted violently opposed democratic and fair change in society?
Nothing I posted is untrue. However, I hear ya.
Oh yeah? Any of it help prove any of the supernatural claims? No? Yeah ok, bye bye then
Also... Cera! I love his awkward ass.
This conversation had nothing to do with what you're talking about.
The word marraige was not even religouse, but a legal term.
"Paul has no knowledge that Jesus had a ministry, Paul doesn't say anything about Jesus's baptism by John, Jesus's temptation in the wilderness, his selection of disciples, his miracles, his healings, his exorcisms, his conflicts with his own family and scribes, Pharisees, and priests, his parables, his all-important teachings on the Kingdom, his classic sermon on the mount, his teaching on / interpretation of / the Law, his semi-vocation as a carpenter, or even his spectacular raising of Lazarus."
Here's the pic my boss sent.....
Thanks for understanding what I?ve Been through..( and what Annette is going through feeling rejection from BOTH sides) . I wanted so much to prove Jesus was God, messiah.... etc. I have fought and fought against the replacement theory people only to see that while they thought he fulfilled all the prophecy it came together for me- I saw that he did in fact think he would fulfill all this prophecy but he didn?t- this is why they say it?s a spiritual fulfillment.....
So, you believe that the church determines what is right & wrong?
is it not objectively moral to cause as little unnecessary suffering as possible? From any perspective- that which causes suffering unnecessarily should be avoided. It becomes objectively moral to not cause unnecessary suffering. What each person defines as unnecessary is irreverent, same with suffering. The position is objectively true regardless of the subject in question- lest I've misunderstood the concept.