"The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity. Nowhere in the Gospels do we find a precept for Creeds, Confessions, Oaths, Doctrines, and whole cartloads of other foolish trumpery that we find in Christianity.?
$hit!! and i thought Wednesday is the safe day!! Uh Oh!!
It is impossible to read the holy texts describing the Abrahamic god and conclude that wisdom comes from that god or that it is even wise to believe in that god.
He went from a hipster to another corporate sheep appropriating someone else's culture in line at a fast food joint. Of course he hates that he wasn't the first white person to visit the store....
Now let me continue with your education:
Upon entering a place of business to purchase off the shelf goods I see no reason why a business owner would deny to sell any item to anyone.
Does it need a purpose? I don't believe the Earth serves a purpose other than to exist. Do you disagree?
God commands them to be benevolent and compassionate, so I do not disagree at all.
Facts are facts? Really? Are you sure that facts aren?t something else?
You forgot to put a joke before your LOL
There is an asymmetry, though. While the scientific method does not strictly exclude any intelligible model, the anti-theist militants actually *do* exclude intelligible models.
When it comes to OUR bodies, yes. YOU have no say. We aren't your property and we aren't your vessels.
No, but leftists will be eating some after the upcoming election.
I gotcha, now that you've explained. But in this case, it was not the dollar amount spent, it was the intentions behind it. You can't be telling me problems about paying necessary bills, like energy etc, and be scrambling to come up with it after you spent it on impressing the Joneses across the street. You can't tell me you're family oriented if I see you leaning on your parents for help, as a direct result of your choices. If you can't do it for yourself, by yourself, then you surely can't be responsible for a family.
Theres no strawman, I was ammoral as an atheist and thought most atheists were stupid even though I was one.
A VERY poor approach and one certain to alienate rather than win a soul; however, it is protected speech.
Amen to that.
If men are routinely being killed because of someone's lacking of physical fitness was happening often I would have an issue, but I don't see that happening alot
lol. I cited the bible. Your fallacy ad hom is telling. You've no logic or reason in your position so you feel you must attack mine. Sorry but not a tittle. Not one jot of a pen.
Where's the evidence that Christ existed? Your rant "no evidence" is at least on point because THERE IS NONE. Your silly claim that no evidence will will convince me is in the absence of any evidence to attempt to do so. So it's really just a self serving comment without merit. As I said before, disproving Atwill is not proving that a historical JC existed. Also, you keep switching to the existence of "Christianity" instead of "Christ" as if they are one in the same. So do you not understand that they aren't one in the same or don't understand the context of this thread.
The first of many
Cute belief. That's what they all say too.
Please check out my response below. It?s not about mechanistic scientific complexity. The issue isn?t Science. It?s Existential Philosophy, at least, not Science. It?s a different Epistemology. He?s demonstrating the Scientism fallacy, like Dawkins and the rest.
Not surprised at all.
No, if we take a trip to the zoo or the Indian subcontinent, we see rhinoceri. Not univorns.
Because we are still sinners and we still have the sin nature. We are not God we are human. Some are just hypocrites who use religion to cover their corrupt lives. God has warned us of false teacher and preachers so yes they use it for monetary gain etc. Just because one says they are saved doesn't make it so.
I bet Liberals don't even get there pets spayed and neutered. Just let them run around, humping everything in site.......geesh.
So punishment can actually be a sign of love, right?
If you?re resorting to some fabricated conspiracy that girls can only outpace boys on college applications if grade school teachers are sexist as ?arguing for boys? I guarantee you you?re ?feminizing? them worse than any participation trophy ever could.
So you have no interest in substantiating your clairvoyant claim about Tucker Carlson, Miss Cleo?