Ummm sure thing whatever ya say, cupcake.
"Also, a guy who takes invites me somewhere on the first couple dates and doesn't offer to pay tells me he is not looking to impress me."
Trust is definitely needed to have a successful marriage. He has to understand that he must end ALL contact with her. Honesty is needed as well. Lay all the cards on the table. Many feel emotional attachments aren't as harmful as physical cheating but they are still damaging and often lead to the physical. I know of many marriages that found success after definitional and physical cheating. Here are two articles that have helped many marriages. I hope that you find them of some use that the best outcome happens for you.
Not sure what you are talking about or asking here
Perhaps you could humor me by elaborating a bit.
Yours go's Morons Are Governing Again
A crook, an eedgit & a wannabe!
Its not emotional manipulation ffs, its COMMON SENSE.
The FBI concluded she didn't.
That's so nauseating :(
don't give a shit, she went down on him, I haven't heard anything about him grabbing her by the head and doing a pelvic thrust. was it inappropriate given his marriage, and that they worked together, hella yes but not illegal. the only dumb thing he did was freaking lie and perjure himself. man I wouldn't give a damn If i were president and sleeping with a different chick every night, i'd be proud (as long as i wasn't married and she didn't work for me), i'd make sure that's the type of info that would get leaked to the press, I would leak everywhere. I don't know about the chicks, but most of the men in america wouldn't give a shit and would honestly be jealous. I'd be using my title as president to get pussy (as long as i carried out the duties of my office). i mean who doesn't want to sleep with the president whether they are male or female (ignore the current president, even his wife doesn't want to sleep with him), as long as they are good looking and a decent human being. that'd be a hell of a story to share with ur friends,
1) Pull the lever. One dies. Five live. No change if I know the one tied up on the side track.
Again, you're welcome. Please stay were you is. Really. We dont need more angry coffee drinkers:)
Education is never truly worthless. There are many things that interest me that I would not borrow $60,000 to learn. The ROI just isn't there. Also - some of these things can be learned on line for free. Or one can travel and experience things first hand - like art.
Analogies with bans against interracial marriage are bogus. Race is not part of the definition of marriage. A ban on interracial marriage is a ban on the same actions otherwise permitted because of the race of the particular people involved. It is a discrimination against people, not actions. The miscegenation laws were all about paranoid racist theories, not defining marriage: They were about child-bearing, so in that sense, they actually recognized the creation of new life as central to the idea of marriage. And even having sex with someone of another race was forbidden in some states. But the so-called ?bans? on homosexual marriage actually prohibited NOTHING on homosexual couples, except not recognizing ?marriages!? Nothing was criminalized.
I could get behind that
JA is the claimant. JA has the burden of proof. Now, spare us your dishonesty.
And that makes it true.
At no point did I say he said that.
Funny kind of atheist. I think you are sitting on the wall.
Read Breitbart for a few months and get back to me. Breitbart is invariably one of the RW sites that tries to back every single statement by Trump about his actions and sow disinformation about the Mueller investigation whenever there is the least opportunity. If there's a glimmer of a chance Breitbart can twist an element of a story into something that exonerates Trump in the Trump-Russia investigation, they're on it. They oftentimes will write extremely short entries, not even real stories, when they're trying to shill twisted news that is not on solid ground when they take the story from another web site. They'll cut out the parts of the original story that run contrary to what they're saying. Voila, Trump wins again or the anti-Trump forces are proven to be treasonous again. It doesn't matter that Rep. Paul Ryan and several other major Republicans have admitted there was sufficient justification for the DOJ to have used a confidential informant. Nope, they believe Trump was spied on and that spies were implanted in his campaign.
1. Unsupported claim. And still doesn't make the things claimed by him in the Bible to be just or moral.
Well, thanks for posting the links to the home pages of various apologetics (not intended to be dismissive or otherwise inflammatory, but that's just the role they're playing). Is there any particular material on any of the those domains that you're wanting me to evaluate as evidence?
Only the Christian god can judge who is a Christian. The rest of you are insufferable posers and hypocrites.