You claimed " to make that decision".
oh, it's that guy. i have him blocked.
That is how it was written. Jesus, Paul and most Bible scholars preDarwin also took it literally.
"The gene or genes in the Xq28 region that influence sexual orientation have a limited and variable impact. Not all of the gay men in Bailey's study inherited the same Xq28 region. The genes were neither sufficient, nor necessary, to make any of the men gay."
She may have second thoughts . The Hate caused her to make a stupid desisions now she has to pay a price !
You best read the verdict again if you think that?s what they said. They said the CCRC showed an impermissible hostility towards religion that negated the decision. So your premise is incorrect.
the way you handled it was poor in my opinion. my response would be apologize for my reaction and explain why you reacted that way.
When I was born White Castle Sandwiches were 20 for $1
Na, that's just you ...
Lighten up! :-)
The man serves homosexual customers.
Did you read the replies tho? Lol
Despite the author's repeated insistence that his works were not allegorical?
And yet, both you and I can fully see the fraud of Sai Baba for what it is. But believers refuse to see it. But to accept the bible as true, I have to accept the claims of believers, which as we can tell can be very unreliable.
I can't remember even one like i said.
Of course she shouldn't be punished. Women are delicate creatures that need to be pampered even when they are being puckish and cute.
Your Church is fairly Christian with the exception for same sex marriage and homosexuals in the priesthood. In todays world where nearly every liberal social view is acceptable, your Church is fairly conservative/Christian. I'm a Southern Baptist which I define as being Bible believing Christians, I would not be a part in your Church over the homosexual views. This issue has came up in our Church as well and that is why I separate myself from many in this denomination that have caved on this issue.
if something isn't clearly written then it's only fair to assume something considering the door was left wide open to interpret something incorrectly.
I doubt he's ever looked at disqus - plus he's in the lab almost all day :)
You don?t subscribe to Mormonism because you do not believe Joseph Smith to be a spokesperson for God. You do not subscribe to Islam because you do not believe Mohammed to be a spokesperson for God. Yes there are millions of Mormons and there are 2 billion Muslims, but is that even a good reason to believe that those two men are spokesperson for God? Nope.
No, you really cannot. To do so, just makes one into a compromiser, who refuses to believe what God has said. That is being lukewarm.
There are six Roman Catholics currently serving on the court (Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Sonia Sotomayor, and Clarence Thomas) and three Jews (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Elena Kagen). BELIEVERS... *zomgz*
My head hurts after reading this mess.
I know democrats struggle with the 2nd amendment but liberals for the most part, as is fundamental to their philosophy, protectors of liberty.
so, people that are barren or people choosing not to have kids, SHOULD NOT have sex?
you ARE a deplorable, aren't you.
Best of luck.
No breath was imparted into Eve, and yet she is also a living being with a soul. And all the children who proceed from Adam and Eve also have souls, no breath required there. Because again, Adam was special. I don't know how Judaism handles this, though.
Not an atheist but Your right to swing your arm ends at my nose.
now you're backpedalling and hedging. instead of telling me what you didn't say, and what you didn't imply, tell me what you're saying without strawmanning with your thoughts on my position per "