"IT IS WRITTEN"
Says a person who falls asleep every night. Ding Dong time to wake up.
Like all of it. Like literally everyone else does.
Omg, I loved that. Deadpool is fabulous, and those heels are just... So elegant on him.
She said YES!...............to bacon
Lets go ma!
Not if He still has holes in His hands and feet.
I don't get why people have any take on this at all. Like, turning this couple's doubly joyous day into the observer's excuse to get salty is ridiculous.
Thank you! LOL
Sorry you're wrong.
Nationalize the schools, perhaps? I am no fan of the Church especially when I read of its treatment of children in the last century. Maybe it is a drastic over simplification, but I am a dirty commie after all O
It fits here.
Tis a mystery
When was an Obama staffer ever kicked out of a restaurant because of Obama?
I just pointed it out with some of your very own posts.
If it was a pizzeria that Clinton walked into, every MAGAbilly would accuse it of harboring a child sex ring.
"Why would The Almighty allow persecution, suffering? "
Honesty and ?niceness? are not diametrically opposed concepts.
In the vedic tradition a qualified teacher is necessary to interpret scripture otherwise the reader will interpret it according to his or her ignorance and preferences. The scripture is not considered the source of the knowledge, only the official record. The source is consciousness itself.
Well first, you are referring to a pre-constitutional document, 2 it is referring to the Deist Creator that has nothing to do with Jehovah or the other sky fathers, and 3 in the first draft Jefferson was going to say something far more 'reasoned' but decided to go with a poetic flourish:
No lie can be concealed forever.
Oh, STFU you humourless harridan.
what are crack fries?
Civil unions in addition to marriage would not have satisfied Uncle Sam, if the Constitution is applied properly. It is commonly held that establishing "civil unions," even with identical benefits and responsibilities to marriage, would constitute a "separate but equal" condition. The SCOTUS already affirmed that the "separate but equal" treatment that was once afforded to blacks was unconstitutional.
Moral is a fluid thing that change with the society it is in.
Pay down the debt before it sinks the economy. Nearly a half trillion in interest payments already every year. Sooner or later it will dwarf even the defense budget and all other entitlements.
What a Moron.LMAO!!
Oh I'm sure they did. Ha!
Couple of things. Unless things take a dramatic change for the Trump he'll hardly ever come close to the top of the list for best presidents. He'll be sharing the bottom with Grant and the like.
LOL, oh no no no, by your previous argument it was Congress that passed that legislation.
nature does not for t he most part subscribe to homosexuality, in some cases its a display of dominance in others its survival. If it did it on a macro scale it would be the end of its species.
So we're back to using the Bible to prove itself.
You have it 100% bassackward. Who is cleaning up it's mess first, before the rest of society when it comes to sexual abuse. Even though the abuse rate is half what it is in both secular institutions and other religion faiths around the globe. Why do you think the reporting is heavily skewed toward the faith where it is least likely to happen, yet completely ignore others that are more likely to abuse.
They believe more starting kinds were created, but evolution varied life from there.
I look at the kinds of paradoxes that arise from Godel's Incompleteness Theorems. Even simple mathematical systems are incapable of "proving" their own truth. And yet we would say math is a valid method of deriving "true" statements. You can also look at Gettier's short paper on "Justified True Belief." Those sorts of things suggest to me that both claims and "proof" are much fuzzier ideas than casual speech would suggest. More significantly, I strongly disagree with the assertion that a true statement cannot be simultaneously false. That rule of an "excluded middle" is of course a staple of Aristotelian logic. So I prefer paraconsistent logical systems, which allow paradox and inconsistency. An example of such paradox might be asking "do you love your child?" after they've hit you with a baseball bat. The idea that something can't be both true and false is an idea imposed by classical logic, which certainly has its uses, but falls far short of universal truth. Its falsity every day in lived experience. I think myth and religion are particularly rife with these kinds of paradoxes.