Ah yes, and this brings us to your use of the "No True Christian" idea.
That's a picture of one of the victims, FYI.
The fucking weasels will fall back in line. Or go to hell.
Ah no. Atheists would be happy to see real evidence. The problem is, again as I noted before, you are confusing belief with evidence. If your god was so smart, it would know what sort of evidence would be convincing for all of humanity.
No--it was an anecdote-hence my pointing out your use of 'likely' as a descriptor.
Love that show.
If it was unclear, then I've now cleared it up.
Just entered a link. Hopefully it will display.
The idea that sexual is better than asexual is all hindsight. After all, it was evolution that ingeniously came up with this idea and perfected it, right? It could have easily done the same for asexuality. After all, evolution can make things evolve for the better. And seeing there are just is as much advantage as disadvantage for both, so it's not necessarily as simple as, nature just lead us here. If evolution is true, I can see diversity in sexuality: both sexual and asexual and maybe even bisexual and trisexual among virtually all the species! Why is evolution limited? Natural selection shouldn't mean natural elimination, yet for a legacy theory's sake we are forced to believe that.
How do you know anything at all about Little Alfie?s ?soul? or its whereabouts? What a silly comment.
didn't I just say I wasn't interested in evangelizing?
Wrong. There is not a scrap of science in the bible
Because how much it will cost to buy a car doesn't change based on the amount of debt you have on your credit card.
Sex and gender are part of biology. You said you don't want them taught in school.