You've not even answered that question once. So, we'll try again.
You declared I must be against interracial marriage. There is no basis for that.
yeah, yeah. Another walk down memory lane. just another "Democrats good, Republicans bad" stroll through simplified history.
This was directed at Francisco, but it seems like you have some underlying issues if you think it applies to you. ;)
"Nonsensical conclusion" and "bigotry"? Why, because you confuse Fundamentalism and the Inquisition with an adequate treatment of Christianity as a phenomenon? You better look up your terms, because you are projecting your own behavior on others in your muddled thinking.
But, you do accept the miraculous! It is plainly miraculous that a "singularity" appeared out of nowhere, exploded for no reason with no outside help, and then magically brought everything into existence (also for no reason.) And just coincidentally pond scum got hit by lightning, and magically came alive! Utter foolishness.
And with the US lowering rates, we are screwed if Andrea gets in.
lol, yup! mind if I edit?
Btw thanks for calming me down and making me giggle again- xxxxx oooo
She didn't skip or leave anything off.
Freaking BOOM. Killin' it, TS ;)
Post the link
Not completely with what I've read to date.
Your appear to be confusing entropy (disorder) with complexity (structure). The second "law" (it is actually a well supported theory, in an isolated system, disorder increases over time, with a legacy name of "law") of thermodynamics only addresses the former, and is not relevant to the issue of complexity, which is what happens in between instantiation and dissolution as entropy increases.
He didn't need to help, they will destroy themselves from within.
For me it does......without a doubt.
Sorry, the first amendment says nothing about what is or is not a religion so you'd be wasting your time there.
I have. And did you ever ask?