Neither of us know that you you claim to.
I have given you the channel rules. Please abide by them. It is my job to split hairs, not yours. You can manage with the directions I have given you.
Just like with moderate Christians, they take the parts out that they like and discard the rest. Everyone does this for every religion that exists.
Okay but I think most people get my drift when I use the word evil and all we're trying to do is share our ideas. Very effective word, which is all it is supposed to be.
Its called perspective.
conservatives are so stupid
That makes it all the more inane.
I remember that and mentioned it too.
I'll try not to notice XP
Ive already addressed what Ive said in more than one way, scroll up and read.
I am here. I am now. That's all I get to work with. I try to make the best of it. All anyone can really do.
Only the Christian god can judge who is a Christian. The rest of you are insufferable posers and hypocrites.
Evidence > your comment.
God does not force what is right. That is not Love. The earth and all of us suffer the consequences of not wanting God to be our Father. We want to be gods ourselves. And God allows that to be so.
Can't wait to see it!!
????, He'd be mad, let's get out there lol ??You're my pick to get it done though, I'll stream live, it's a hit J.
No pompous man will rule my life.
Check the census data, and see how many people died of starvation.
Jesus's Word would have spread faster if he had more sophisticated transport.
Or... IF carbon dating were to confirm a biblical old testament event theologians would have to reevaluate a god sized day (so to speak). :) Time itself would shudder (for some of them).
OK I don't know who the "baker" is? Clue me in, please!!
Is that because he told you or because it is said in the Bible?
And it begins!!! Good going!
Personally as long as people aren't harming other's I couldn't care less what they do. That goes for one person or any group of consenting people. Whatever dynamic works for that group is fine with me up to the point that it directly interferes with others.
Exactly what I was going to say. ;)
That's like saying "evolution is a theory" but "there is no theory of evolution"
Strawman. He didn't say "in the name of". You're the only one here who said "in the name of". He's asking if there's a link.
Good morning Stinkers and Stinkerettes. Sigh it is going to be a classic Monday... A normal jail cell is 6 feet by 8 feet and fits 1 prisoner... My cubicle is a whopping 8 x 8 and as of this morning fits 2 prisoners... I am going to learn close quarters manners or someone is gonna die... Coffee is ready. I am not in the mood to open up the pool today.
If you can't control what's INSIDE, how do you want to control what's OUTSIDE?
What is your proposed alternative to the origin of their sexuality? Where does it come from if not choice or genetics?
You'll have to point out where I made anything close to that claim. He proved beyond a shadow that morality exists in nature. Ought vs choice is your diversion.
Inflation probably came from some kind of vacuum fluctuation.The churches mentioned in the epistles and in Revelation are fictional. The Church produced these phony letters to be read in real churches. "Look we have this letter to a church from a real live apostle named Paul, James, John, whatever which gives it supposed authority and then the churchmen tell the flock, well we all better obey. Give us your money, your political support and those gorgeous young boys, we have these texts. They are written by people who take their orders directly from God." It's a money and power grab from a religion of sun worshipers that was competing with other cults, Mystery Religions, Judaism, Arab moon worshiping cults and so on for money, power and converts. They had their own texts too. Christianity won out, burned the literature of the other religions and took over because Constantine wanted one world religion. That's what Christianity was supposed to be.
By just about any measure you can propose. Health, happiness, lifespan, wealth... Actually, I can't think of a proposed measure by which we aren't better off than 2000 years ago, that isn't obviously absurd ("number of people fluent in latin")