Hmm I would completely forget about it. You never have to see him again. Your bf has to work with this guy.
I lived in close quarters to muslems for approx 20 years. I think that I know a bit about their customs and lifestyles. I am by no means an "expert" nor would I ever say that I would want to be one.
Or math. Or science. Or EVOLUTION! Muahahaha...
That is what sets Christianity apart.
As much as Shawsy wants to deny it, from what I've been able to piece together Obama had done the same in regard to separating the children from their parents.
No and HUgs to help take care of what is ailing you...
Fair point... Women's studies' CAN be a legitimate topic of academic study. But because it CAN doesn't mean it IS, more often than not, it isn't. It's merely used to indoctrinate rather than educate.
A culture subsequently persecuted by christians and islamists.
The Indonesians arrested a Japanese soldier on December 18, 1974.
Not really. I've been watching that swing for decades. Congress thrives on conflict without change. If they actually accomplish something, they become responsible for its inevitable failure, because it will always be a horrible compromise. So they fight and point fingers and do very little.
Is the Bible the infallible word of God?
It?s hilarious, both things.
Trudeau has been bad mouthing Trump since before the election. Did he think DJT was just going to ignore him?
Obama spent $10 Trillion to lead the second slowest recovery from a recession on record
YES YES YES!
Take the a priori arguments of Atheism at face value: You only live once; the Universe is not constructed justly; There is no meaningful judgment of your life.
The mother in the video, her reasoning is an example of why woman should remain silent.
Fat shaming women???
Not enough vibrato for that song lol. I didn?t like the dude who sang it. Also, I don?t like that song for a wedding. Lmao where was Luther?s Here & Now. Or at least Stevie?s As.
Lackers do not avoid making a truth claim. At a minimum their claim is that they have reasonable evidentiary standards which aren't being met. These standards must be shown to be reasonable, else all claims can arbitrarily be rejected by unreasonable criteria, and their position would be irrational. But this only applies for those who admit they are not actually engaging the question, that they have no response to it. For them, god exists in the same degree to which it does not, and in this sense they cannot be said to be "without" god.
Let's deal with that first paragraph.
Atheism is non belief. That is not a bad argument. That is literally what the word means and exactly what every atheist means when they call themselves that.
Nope. I realize you need to deflect from the obvious bias you carry. I am merely seeing if you have the same "enlightenment" regarding fox as CNN. I have my answer, thank you.