Born in NYC, racist.
Since your god is defined, he is known. That he can't be found simply means he doesn't exist as described.
Say "When the recession hit, stock in baby parts took a nosedive but thankfully recovered."
Talking about funny...there's nothing funnier than you, Bizarrobama!
I was following you for a while there, but you lost me at "We can not sin." What exactly do you mean by that? Does this mean that we are incapable of doing any wrong? Does this mean that we never lie, or can never disobey parents or break the law? It doesn't seem to make sense to me, but I'd love to hear your rationale.
Putin can do Trump's thinking for him.
I want mac n cheese right now.
"Just a few?" Hyperbole much?
there's beautiful people everywhere your gonna notice but don t deviate from the conversation with your so, I'd actually join my so because beauty is beauty ,just don t let the staring last too long
Completely different. I doubt you actually read or heard any of it.
We have not figured out how to repeal gravity.
That's not evidence.
A distinction without a clue, like that makes it ok. They asked him to bake them a wedding cake, the man makes wedding cakes for others, the refusal to sell them a wedding cake is plainly discrimination.
Spell my name correctly, or don't use it. As you seem to ALWAYS spell my name wrong, I can't help but think you are doing it intentionally.
Can't wait for free agency because this finals besides game 1 has been boring
Troll! Why, now that?s substantive. Insult you? You better go find what your really looking for. If I wanted to insult you, I would have used a lot heavier words than mere description.
That, "/sarc" tag indicates sarcasm. I've argued elsewhere in these comments that indeed followers of Jesus - if they actually follow His teachings - are expected to be non-violent to the point of "turning the other cheek". Then again, they are also expected to be kind to others, give of themselves, speak up for the downtrodden, the less privileged, and provide things like health care and food for those who don't have any for *whatever* reason.
They are still upset over mixed rave marrages being made le gal the same way
Definitely a strawman argument.
No, refusing to believe the claim period until the claimants have met their burden of proof. It's known as the default position.
Not much greater.
Your wife and you apparently have different ideas of what it means to be "clean." If she wants it done her way, then it perhaps she should be the one cleaning.
Vote wise, it isn?t. But the ruling was narrow because the majority ruled for the baker on the basis of a biased court on the lower level, and not so much that it was a 1st amendment violation.. Only 2 said it was a clear violation of the 1st amendment. What we need is a majority opinion to cite a violation of the 1st amendment in future rulings.
Weak. As for him thinking that Jesus was a philosopher, got a link for that?
Again, you not knowing how its done, doesn't make it a set up.
Well it's a good thing Prince Harry and the Duchess of Sussex are there to all show us how virtuous people are pure until marriage!
Agreed. But you're now saying nearly HALF THE NATION is this?
Revelation chapter 5:
I made a zangie garni this week, called blatjang. It is South African in origin. Has dried apricots and raisins, onions, garlic, slivered almonds, vinegar, brown sugar and spices including ginger and chili powder. It's quite good, definitely zangie.
Do you believe the bible to be...