Check out my awesome unicorn high priest conversation with Dynbrake above for an example of how his "rationality" works.
Victor's sock account, is that you?
Ah, so Pascal's wager is refuted by you.
Yeppers. The sad part of that evening is that I suspect that the vast majority of the nation missed the takeaway from that spectacle. And that was, that trump takes perverse pleasure in publicly humiliating those who oppose him.
Our traditional allies are avoiding eye contact with us, but the A List of Shitholes love us.
Yeah, we sure wouldn't wanna do that. Might make you look like you posted this just so you could see if people would say "MOOSLIMS ARE BAD, Y'ALL!"
No. Its not.
So give us your thoughts on it. That way we know you better and you know me better. As Relationship is just that. To know one another.
OMG, I'm getting sick to my stomach. :(
I grant that there is a POSSIBILITY that a creator exists, but there is currently zero verifiable evidence for such a claim. Thus I have ZERO surety for both 1 and 2.
Macroeconomics and business are two separate fields. Trump was left about $4 billion in today's money by his father and blew almost all of it, so it doesn't look like he know much about of business except getting money from the Russians.
What? Lol, how so? It keeps changing for one. How hard is it to find Europe? Now its at what...7-10 thou years? Advent of agriculture?
True, a brain isn't fully developed until 13. But that's why you give special consideration for most other crimes. But at 13, a child does have a good understanding of right and wrong. And at that point they also know their actions have consequences to a certain degree. They still don't have the ability to judge their actions as well as an adult of course, but they do indeed know cold blooded murder is absolutely wrong. Sadly I also don't think there's much help for a child capable of something like this and they'll always be a risk to society even after treatment.
Read Matthew 22.
Neo-Darwinism merely refers to the state of understanding that has developed since Darwin's time. It's not a movement, it doesn't have tenets distinct from the rest of the field, it's not particularly useful as an anchor point in discussion -- and it's not collapsing.
I'm no fan of the D triple C, but the fact remains, it's the people that shape the elections, and be sure if you're not voting for the lessor of two evils, the republicans are voting for the greater.
Excuse me but before you frame your certificate to lecture people about logic, I need to inform you that "And they can make that claim, but they are wrong", does NOT constitute a valid argument upon which to predicate your assertion: "I'm sorry, there is no way around that."
Ughhh...Where is everyone today?!
Explain: Do you mean that a high percentage of gays are serial killers or do you mean that a high percentage of serial killers are gay? Do you have legitimate stats to back up either contention?
I make you an offer, and you respond with a personal insult?
I think since non-Muslim northern Europeans have pretty much stopped having babies, they're going to need
Don't you? You live on Mars or on Earth?
No matter how you spin it, saying that you're probably wrong is not inciting violence against you.
I am just playing devils advocate for the believers.
Actually, He succeeded. Not just because people are still talking about Him 2k years later. His goal was to create a new man. A man that has His spirit living inside of him. A man like me. Filled with the joy, peace and hope of knowing HIM.
It sounds great on paper though doesn't it?
And what is your source for this?
Pascals wager only scares Christians
The world will pass it by and leave it irrelevant.
You should give him a second chance so he can cheat on you five more times.
Why should anyone respect the patently unfounded and absurd beliefs of anyone else?
Real milk if your body can handle it. Almond milk tastes like water.
No, I know.
Declaring people who you know agree with you to be your "peers" does not make peer review. If it did, "UFOlogists" would be "experts" on UFOs. Every pseudoscientist these days has gotten in on the fake peer review game by acknowledging each other as "experts" and publishing in the same journals.