I wouldn't fight to silence any atheist who puts up a billboard against Christianity. That's the difference between you and I.
yo said "pussies",, i can see your mouth saying it,,
Fascinating! Physicists have take a word 'nothing' (the absence of something) and repurposed it to mean 'everything.' That is some heavy philosophizing from a scientist who proclaims such a practice as being dead. Why not just make a new word to declare this state of 'everything?' One can only speculate as to the reasoning, and I suspect it is because the limited potential of our finite minds to understand anything outside of space/time, outside of everything.
No? How about a gun manufacturer who designs guns for sport? Is he to be held responsible if someone commits a murder/suicide with the gun he designed?
no that would be mcliar or wynne
So -- you reject the pyramid of evidence quality established by evidence-based medicine, can provide no justification for doing so, and whine about word usage?
I would lead us to the nearest grocery store and head down the baking aisle. At that point I would pull out my phone and Google, who am I kidding, I have the ingredients to make whoopie pies memorized. I would ensure all the items were in our basket and proceed to checkout.
This is total garbage!
I still have to give props to Golden State Warriors. They're truly the best team in the league, and will be a great DYNASTY team in NBA history. They aren't the first team to adopt pace & space in this era but they'll undoubtedly be the most successful one. We're witnessing history here and it'll take time to know Steph Curry's true legacy. Congrats on 2 in a row...
Originally as a barrier against Sun.... Out of Africa... ?? ??
Whatever, my point is that the research that you are making your point with has been deemed by the researchers themselves "We believe that the research has led nowhere". You are aware of this fact, yet you're still using it, and accusing others of "spouting a series of blatant falsehoods".
I think it's because they can. Most men are stronger than females physically . I think anytime an option is more available to you, you are more likely to use it. If tomorrow women had more power and more physical strength, you would see the reverse.
It is nice to that SCOTUS has ruled one can have religious immunity from the Fudge Packing community.
No need to delete as this is the purpose of the excercise. You aren't being disrespectful so no issue from me.
You mean Carson Wentz?
not a chance.
And you read 'desperate for rubles", sergei.
That is why, WE THE PEOPLE must put people in office who want to do what is good for the nation and her people instead of Lobbyists and Donors.
The gospel writers used the Septuagint (LXX), the Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures. In the LXX, Isaiah's Hebrew word
No facts only feels huh? Please try when you have facts.
Definitely censorship but that?s where we are headed...if you suck personally we don?t get to see your work professionally
You are wrong. You are projecting what you imagine onto what we see. The Quantum Electron Dynamics model makes superb predictions accepting that, at the quantum scale, nothing is caused. Virtual particles, which are necessarily uncaused, instantiate continuously, forming the quantum flux. I have also previously referenced von Neumann's universal constructors, which can arise through noise. Why do you imagine that your model should be preferred?
It does not have that power. Read the Constitution.
So where do you stand in the philosophical question? I ask this because this sets in motion the rest of your belief.
Magic is the only argument Ruben has. If he drops Magic he has no arguments left
I think other people may have you beat in those stakes.
The God question actually doesn?t depend on Scientific proof, although the health and intelligence benefits of prayer are a good start, as is Psychosomatic healing. Any fantasy that Science is the be all and end all is called by its ideological name, Scientism.
The term " hold your friends close and hold your enemies closer" comes to mind.
To be fair, the claim is that many different gods have been proven not to exist by science, but that would be gods that serve one particular function, eg god of thunder/lightning or the like.
Working in many different male dominated fields, I've heard it and experienced it a lot.
So states should be able to vote in laws that are inherently unconstitutional?
You didn't answer my question.