...You asked....and of course when running out of arguments the Ad Hominem...Typical.
He did not refuse baking a cake, he refused specific art being put on it. You cannot and should not be forced to create art that condones what you consider to be in opposition to your faith. If his strongly held belief is that something is sinful (and every indication is that he has held these same beliefs for a long time) He should not be made to create art that celebrates that sin.
Feminists progressives who hate men???
The constitution is clear.
I just have a higher standard in mind than just not sucking as bad as the Republicans.
Welcome to Love Stinks Adams's. Please read the community guidelines and enjoy your stay.
It means Luke was exaggerating to make a point.
Jesus Christ mate.
be more specific
You know, that's true. I lead a work group composed mostly of peers but also some superiors (including my own boss). They all defer to me a
Go ahead and stay ignorant here
adolescents are valuable commodities
The silly nazis are a hate group, like ?minister? Farrakhan?s nation of islam, the aryan brotherhood, and ?black lives matter?.
On a serious note, I'm not a fan of it personally. It's a pain in the butt.....literally, a pain. I'll pass.
Didja get past the first sentence, John???:
I?m waiting for them to finish so i can watch in one complete swoop.
Insults. How very Christian of you...
He writes anti-capitalism books and rallies for social justice. Indy's guess on his political leanings aren't exactly a stretch.
Maybe they will invade & liberate the White House for us?
it's too late for Betsy
There is no need to " shatter families and destroy a small minority". Just revoke the privilege (genital mutilation is already a crime) and let the courts do the rest. Jewish boys who are not happy with their circumcision can then sue their parents and the Mohel. A Mohel who botches the practice will be responsible and can't hide behind the "tradition".
ummmm no Yoghurt today?
I thought it was the other way around... Sprint buying T-Mobile...
MOVE TO NC!
Because you are basing your definition on a belief.
I am older. Need to check with AARP to see if I qualify.
Oh boy. Do you realize all the destruction to the earths biodiversity to supply jobs, housing and food and products for humans to consume? How about the islands of garbage in the oceans? How about dead zones in the ocean from pollution run off in Rivers?s? How about the acidification of the oceans?
It looks very iffy to me, and I am guessing there is an issue. It is also not saying what TFCC is wanting it to say.
I guess if they would have stoned Jesus, they would be worshipping stones.
Your posts make no sense.
Personal convictions should remain personal and not overrule laws. A service to the public can't discriminate. If you are an anti-Christian baker, you can't refuse to bake a cake for a first Communion lunch. if you are anti-Christian tailor, you can't refuse to make the bride's dress once you know that she's going to marry in church. If you are anti-Christian and sell microphones, you can't refuse to sell them to a priest or a pastor who will use them to preach. If you sell wine, you can't refuse to sell it to a priest who will use it for the mass.
Smoking, indirect or rotisserie?
I suspect that your own personal definitions of "sexually explicit" and "insensitive" are much more expansive than 99% of the rest of the world. That is to say that your definitions of these terms are a little off.
when did that happen and who noticed it first?
The answer to point 4 is that they could have accepted Jesus as the Messiah and the new Jerusalem would have come. Instead they killed God and the temple was destroyed.