Are we sure this isn't an Onion parody?
Christian law comes with dress standards, and behaviour standards for women.
Liberals are fucking scumbags
so, no one.
In 2000, the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission was under the supervision of two men, brothers Stan and Frank Koebel. Both men had been working for the PUC since the 1970s, when they were teenagers and their father worked at the PUC. Neither man had formal training in public utility operation or in water management, but by 2000, both had been promoted to management positions on the basis of their experience. Both brothers carried certification as class 3 water distribution system operators, licenses obtained through a grandfathering program run by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and based on their work experience in their positions. Though Ontario law required that water systems operators receive 40 hours of continuing education per year, Stan Koebel interpreted this to include activities only marginally related to water systems, such as CPR certification, and as a result neither brother used continuing education time to gain or maintain expertise in water safety.
Perhaps you should spend less time insulting people and more time looking up all the things you don't know?
Yes, we need to resist in every way we can.
They would use it in conjunction with a field sobriety test. You fail the test, they give you a swab, they take you in and run the tests.
If we evolved from chimpanzees, how come there are still chimpanzees around?
The hilarious thing is that Christians WANT to believe the history as presented by that site, but the best that site can really do is point out what most Atheists already note in that Christianity is not wholly responsible for many of those problems noted. The problem with Christians is they think that lets them completely off the hook for those problems and that they fail to take responsibility for the amount of those problems that DID occur because of their faith.
Who, me. If you read his first statement "immigrants and non-whites", implies that they are separate groups. Ergo if you are an immigrant you are white, and if non-white you are not an immigrant. When people rant they often do not read what they typed and do not realize it as well.
You never answered my question. Why would you use the example of Alfie and Charlie and make the statement about me not caring for dead children? I don't understand what youre getting at.
Churches do not, unless they are a for profit wedding chapel
What caused it? Something cannot come from nothing.
You are defending maxine waters? The oppressor?
Nothing mortal or defective will accompany our glorified body.
Knowing about someone is different than knowing. I know of Meghan Markle. Does that mean I've met her?
>>"To allow choice, does not mean responsibility is not also divided up."<<
I DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR THAT CHICK FLICK!
There was an old lady named wright
There is no argument
That did not answer my question.
Harsh words, a bit out of your style. Something happened?
This is political, so Mods, feel free to delete.
Also not my point, my point is historical evidence. If you accept the history of my examples why reject the Bible which is as historical as my examples.
Most religions don't seem to have a worthy concept of a creator, but the Hindu & Buddhist types seem the most respectable, perhaps along with some Native American versions. Panentheism seems sensible enough. I'm leary of a personal/personified creator, but I don't exclude that possibility or something close to it in the form of an extraordinarily advanced being, an apex of evolutionary progress. Bottom line: there's no solid answer, especially if the multiverse model is valid.