My apologies I thought it was a typo. Now I?ve learned a new word haha. My experiences speak to the truth presented in biblical teachings. I have experienced them to be true.
So you can't describe how atheists define the supernatural, assuming they all describe it in the same way.
"It's also clear that mistaking correlation for causation is an easy human mistake.".... Yes.... Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Funny thing is, it might actually make more sense than when Obama received his.
Well let?s stipulate up front that if you asked me to prove the existence of god X you?d be asking the wrong man. It?s my business to prove assertions of its existence false. I do appreciate your observation of the fact that we actually have much in common, however, more perhaps than you realized.
My Christian neighbor's kid died. Had hundreds to thousands "praying" for him.
I'm not interested in your argument why should I be? I have self-knowledge and enjoy the fruits of that knowledge. I'm completely satisfied.
But if we weren't 'intended' to be right-handed, then left-handedness and right-handedness would be 50/50. (Basic statistics).
I think you went a little too far there.
The sole purpose of the universe could be just so that a "Perfect" Creator might have new experience.
To an indoctrinated bot, maybe so. First you jumped wrong and thought I was advocating for scientific derivation of ought from is. Then you decried resorting to means beyond science. Now you suggest the whole issue is irrelevant. As if the issue of how citizens assimilate values and purposes (oughts) were politically irrelevant to a functioning representative republic. Well, maybe so, if you want to replace the republic with bowing to global elitists and their funders. Do you just like to rattle around butting your head against walls? So far, I see little evidence of consistency or insight coming from you. Perhaps your understanding of the scientific method is philosophically stunted?
C'mere you petite little sexy nugget, you. Don't mind my boob in your eye, they have a mind of their own.
Ah right. So nothing to do with a god at all.
Sorry, bro'...evolution's a fact...
I don't, kind of the point really. You can't force me to make it and I can't force you not to be a gross jerk. Our rights do not trump each other's. You have no right to cake, or art, or service, because you have a 7 in your user name, or you looked a a swastika at some point in your life. All of this makes the entire case absurd.
Coffee brings the positivity...Join us brother in the consumption of the holy beverage.
Not "charity" but charitable.
my first really big world problem...
Very well said.
What about them? Who cares they don?t live here we do
But the same amount of what-is-the-point-anyways
The Jews coming back, getting Jerusalem back, about to build their third temple, peace accord happening, Israel divided up, Israel surrounded by Islam, Palestinians precisely listed in obadiah Ch 1....etc
Good news needs repeating over and over and over and over again.
The existence of Adam as an actual historical personage and direct descendant of God at a minimum.
So what's your verdict on the global flood? Did it cover all the tallest mountains - as the Bible directly states - or not?
What evidence do you have for that?
Cults practice group rituals worshipping a deity.
it could but the difference I see for atheists, especially those that are 'ex-religious' have taken the time to analyze the evidence. Their minds are changed after studying the evidence.
Mockery is so much more fun. If not for them, then certainly for you.
He?s got that expression down pat.