Good! I don't want these thoughts attributed to me:)
I would say it has the quality of self-referential incoherence, but it would be incoherent for such to exist, and non-existent things can have no qualities. :P
any time a person puts their mouth on another persons crotch, and osculates, they are performing a sex act. to claim ignorance of that, is lying. in any culture. its why hookers get arrested for it.. and a educated man who plays stupid, is just ludicrous. george costanza tried it after he banged the cleaning lady on his desk. and it did not work for him..
If I was Jake I'd rather know - I believe I'd be able to do my work and maintain a strictly professional relation with the player - and I'd be glad to know more about the kind of jerk this guy is, mainly when people seem to revere him.
Do you have a better explanation?
You are born, live and die. In a short time whatever memory you left in others disappears as well. One day the Sun will go giant red and humanity if still here will be wiped out. Doubt we will last that long.
That might be the simplest option at the end of the day.
I see this was answered already in the comments, but just to be clear, it is because I'm also a man, and my husband and I are married in a country where it is legal for us to do so.
Well thanks. :) I was actually considering moving back to my birth country. I'm an immigrant. I thought America would be more 1776 or something. Then I had to go get a boyfriend who I'm nuts about and he's not allowed to visit my country. Decisions...
you just broke up with one of my parents.
Keep it in your pocket, Peter!
Easy. Adam and Eve story is fable. They did not exist. Everything after doesn't matter.
It's an original....do you ever have any original thoughts?
When your expenses include a fourth private jet... :-)
Fair enough. You are honest. Greatly appreciated. It's a quality sorely lacking today.
No, they deliberately set up a government without any religion. In fact, James Madison wanted it spelled out directly but that got voted down, so what we have is a compromise of just not having God mentioned at all and the first phrase in the First Amendment.
But it is the former type, the isolation of one's group and not admitting others. And is is presumably self-chosen, and not to make some others, except across the boundary. It doesn't and didn't work well, but it is the groups choice. We call a very similar phenomenon nationalism and populism now. It called keeping the stranger out, and his ideas and products.
Please cite any stats that support this. The latest Gallup poll shows Republicans 87% approval, Independents 38% and Democrats 5%. Keep in mind that Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans, so they're the ones to watch.
You don't have any questions for me? I am one of the most staunch pro life people on Disqus. I haven't broken TOS, nor have I called anyone names or belittled anyone for being pro choice. If you really want to know, now is your best chance. Either way, thanks for reading my comment.
To which it's only fair to observe: no one thought this was a reasonable interpretation of scripture until after Jesus had died, and there was interest in justifying his life as prophetic.
["I don?t understand what?s in his mind either."]
1. Creator of the universe exists? 5 for a deistic creator it goes down from there once god is defined.
Both are certainly possibilities.
That's a great movie character....Call George Miller. Furiosa needs another kick ass buddy!
My point is that unless there's some nonhuman third party author or judge of morality; much like the above, its subjective reasoning vs subjective reasoning. At that point there is no better or worse, there is, and there is not.
Why is anyone concerned about themselves if they are dead? An atheist wouldn't be a self-serving prick when they are alive because it hurts themselves and those they care about.
Yes, I didn't claim you said those exact words, I pointed out that you gave a "but Obama" "but Hillary" argument and that they are cliche.
Nope but they do go ahead... ask one