The justices in favor decided not on the basis of law but just on a cultural view of the day! They are saying that marriage is about ?self-actualization,? not about tradition, promoting procreation, preserving the stability of the society, or ensuring the rearing of child by his or her biological parents.
WTF are those things?
Arsenokoites is an unclear word.
But you can be more or less pregnant and more or less human. A human fetus is a human but you are saying that a fetus has equal rights with individual living humans. That is not a fact. That is an opinion. It is an opinion that flies in the face of libertarianism and of science. Still, you can do whatever you want with yourself. That is liberty. A pregnant woman is with herself until her baby is viable. If she is not pregnant with her consent, if she is potentially harmed by pregnancy, or if she just plain doesn't want to be pregnant, she is a free person. Women sacrificing their choice means they give up their liberty. If you decide you don't want an abortion for all the reasons you laid out, good for you, have a baby (although I am nearly certain that you are a man). It is not any kind of neglect to have an abortion. It is just a medical procedure that women choose because they have the liberty to do so.
Good luck finding that law!
It is though. And you've been shown the evidence of this.
"I prefer not to do either."
I like the idea.
not really, you can be agnostic theist or agnostic atheist
Research it. This was the cliam they made and the legal.argument they used
Not saying they didnt. Im just reminding this person of the positive contributions. You have electricity and tooth paste thanks to christians.
I don't really care for the financial / utilitarian argument in support of abortion.
Penis straws,glitter cups,rolling papers= classy asf
The problem is : people who like Israel and Jews like Saudi Arabia, rebels, jihadists who fight against Putin and Bashar (but who behead or stone people on simple denunciation), so I can not believe in these people.