I'm 58 as of week before last.
you commented to me, why don't you just leave me be. The evidence is that im not ageing because Zoe cells are being hatched in my body due to eating the WORD from GOD.
It's true that Muhammad borrowed most of mythology from the Bible, but the Islamic doctrine as a whole (not limited by Koran alone by the way) differs from other religions. For example, 2/3 of the Koran is devouted not to being a good Muslim, but to treating non-Muslims, that's hardly typical for a religion in traditional sense.
without being critical of christianity, do you not agree all these things are also accomplished in a secular society?
How hard is it to understand that I'm discussing this from a Christian faith point of view, as I've mentioned now a few tines. Haven't you still got a grip on it ?
That would depend upon how you define "god". The probability for YHWH existing is the same as that for Vishnu, Gitchee-Manido, etc., something like 10^-45 to ^-50:1
OK. I kinda figured anyway. Just poking holes in one of Indy's lazier anti-Liberal rants.
Thank goodness my former employer never found out how stupid I was. They were so fooled, they kept offering me big increases to continue consulting to our major Science accounts. Sadly, I just wasn't interested in working anymore. Age does that.
Well it does talk about sacrifice. In genesis8:20
Of course it counts, if I were asking for it.
If you expand it beyond just stake burnings, you can probably add quite a bit more time to that. Just think all the time and wasted resources on religion, and the wars fought over religion, going back thousands of years. Even today we're trying to reach for the stars while some religions are fighting to live like cavemen.
You know meat alternatives, I just assumed that is what you meant. Vegan hamburgers and cheese made me go back to omnivorous!!
The mother nourishing her child? To her, the mother is your deity? I don't quite understand where you are coming from. Elaborate.
You're right, Trumpkin......if that makes you feel better.
Why does it have to be down???
Not really much difference. It all stems from the same hatred.
You are correct that they did not use drugs. They used violence and torture (and probably alcohol) not sure how drugs are "worse" if that's what you're aiming at.
I dont know, if i could choose it would be chuck schumer
You talk like you're trying implant a hypnotic suggestion into my head but it's not working. I'm not suggestible.
I really wish this homework didn?t suck so much. Rattle is simple to use but the output is for shit. Give me Tableau any day.
I am not hiding? feel free to google me, just add openeye on to the end... And it is 100% factually correct, you are a racist / white supremacist, are you actually going to deny it? you realise all your previous comments on disqus are public?
A sin must be determined by its outcomes immediate and long term. What are its fruits? Sex is a lot of fun but it can kill you or strap you with child-support payments for 18 years so proceed wisely in that enterprise.
I have read the O.T. in the KJV. The talking donkeys and snakes, the magic - all point to a work of fiction, I'm afraid.
Very true, you might as well just cut your loses.
Thank you for proposing such an interesting and sobering topic.
The western economy pal. Everyone was climbing out.
1)bible doesn?t indicate the earth is flat
That's because you take yourself too seriously.
Well, one of the key rationale's for granting tax exempt status to churches, besides the fact that the donations their members give have in most cases already been taxed, is so they can give tax exempt status to other not religious groups that perform charitable work, to encourage that kind of grass roots outreach which is considered to be a good thing. If only non religious charitable work was tax exempt, that would be a kind of discrimination against religious groups, and a violation of the 1st Amendment. So all groups defined as charitable are treated the same. It makes it possible for folks to deduct their donations to the Red Cross and the like, as a kind of carrot by the government to make those kind of donations. But it must include religious charitable work to be fair under our system.
*shrug* Talk about un-falsifiable claims. Who knows what would have happened, I don't see any reason to assume humanists would have created hospitals for the poor. You are also ignoring my first link and statistic about charitable giving, that is clearly due to the religion