Some channels you can't. I'll keep it in mind. I did have some hesitation about using it.
"How do you explain trees?!", "How do you breathe without god?!", oh and let's not forget, "I prayed and god helped me find my car keys"
I am not at all upset with Kitty......Neither will Clarence brainwash me.... I went on my own search of the roots of Antisemitism years ago. I was horrified. I asked Clarence if he knew all Jews are born with tails, and Jews suck the blood of Christian Children amongst other things. Still say there is more than meets the eye why he believes the Propaganda he sends to me. So U2 stop worrying. ?? ??
Be careful what you wish for
And... We all believe. It's just that some of us reject the gods or a god, or God, or even GOD, that we believe in!
Pretty sure, yes. The plural would be something like "va'yarshu." Compare Lev. 20:24, God speaking to the Israelites as a whole: "Atem tirshu et admatam": "You shall possess their land." If it wasn't singular, the older translations would not have translated it as "he."
No, lol, no it is not. I explained this to you below
Not really. They will grow out of their superstitious nonsense too. It's happening now.
I understand. I don't blame the applicants of the H1B, I blame the companies that abuse it. It's meant for those companies that just can't find any domestic person to fill that role, not to replace American domestic workers with cheaper labor.
It says it happened another way. Why not? Godditit? Honestly...is it so extreme?
You seem to be operating under some weird delusion that evolution is a life philosophy or a way of thinking that influences daily decisions.
No, Left-wingers scream "rights" and make a travesty of real rights.
I'm not talking about a wall. That's nothing but very expensive security theater. I'm taking about actual security which would have to be multifaceted.
Any day now the left will announce its political program!
Was Mengele right about that? Did it benefit millions? One cannot justify evil on the hope of doing good if that hope is unfounded. Taking risks cannot be said to pay off if they don't pay off. One must weigh the risk of the benefits.
History shows us this. At some point in the 17th and 18th centuries, teaching the family religion and family spiritual well being, became a womans role.
Did Christianity harm civilizing respect for human freedom and dignity? In some ways, because of magical-belief over-emphasis on salvation hereafter, Christianity impeded science for awhile. However, what laid Western Civ open to Islamic hordes may have been more attributable to its weakening by pestilence and disease.
Well no. If you think rights are endowed by a creator according to our Declaration and you do not deny basic human biology, it is far more logical and consistent with our foundation of rights to be pro-life, especially in the case of consensual sex.
Yes, LOTS of reasons.
It does not matter who was against Paul.
WTF with all these insistences that a 'custom item' somehow magically makes it okay to discriminate? It doesn't. Her religious beliefs are protected by law. He cannot refuse to sell to her because she believes in God.
A.1) "The end of Paganism in the West."